Thursday, May 22, 2008

Indonesian clerics call for the banning of Ahamdiyas.

Subj: Indonesian clerics call for the banning of Ahamdiyas.
1. what do you expect from the religion of peace ?WebXpurt <> wrote: Cleric calls for ban of infidel sect : RADICAL Indonesian cleric Abu Bakar Bashir has called for the ban of an “infidel” Islamic sect as debate raged in the world’s most populous Muslim country over religious freedom and tolerance.Mr Bashir said the government must swiftly disband the minority Ahmadiyah branch of Islam to protect mainstream Indonesian Muslims and prevent violent sectarian unrest.“Ahmadiyah is an infidel organisation using the name of Islam, which aims to disrupt Islam,” he told a press conference called to urge the government to act on the recommendation of an inter-departmental team to outlaw the sect.“We urge the Indonesian government to immediately and officially ban and dissolve Ahmadiyah. We warn the government that any delay to do so will potentially create horizontal conflicts,” he said.He explained that by “horizontal conflicts” he meant sectarian violence between mainstream Indonesian Muslims and Ahmadis, who number only about 200,000 in Indonesia.Without a ban, people might take matters into their own hands, he said, a warning made all the more resonant after a mob attacked and razed an Ahmadiyah mosque last week.“We never recommend any attacks or destruction but Muslims will fight each other if the government doesn’t want to ban Ahmadiyah,” said the cleric, who served almost 26 months in prison for conspiracy over the 2002 Bali bombings before being cleared and released.Habib Rizieq Shihab, head of the militant Islamic Defenders Front, said his followers would not resort to violence but stood ready to help the government enforce a ban through dialogue.“If the government issues the ban, we agreed to help the government to convince the Ahmadiyah followers to return to the real Islam through dialogue. We won’t use any violent approach,” he said.The government has not indicated how it will respond to last month’s recommendation from the Coordinating Body for Monitoring Religions and Beliefs - a panel set up during the Suharto dictatorship - to outlaw Ahmadiyah.The sect, established in the country since the 1920s, believes Mohammed was not the final prophet, contradicting a central tenet of Islam.Its plight has raised concerns among moderate Indonesians and human rights activists about religious tolerance in the country of some 230 million people, nearly 90 per cent of whom are Muslim.Earlier today, hundreds of people rallied in central Jakarta in a show of support for religious freedom.Representatives of the Ahmadiyah sect as well as Muslims and Christians gathered to urge the government to resist pressure from Islamic hardliners to ban the sect.“We are here to show to Indonesia, to the world, that Indonesians love peace. To show that there are more Indonesians who love peace than those who don’t,” an organiser told the crowd.The demonstrators carried banners reading Stop Religious Fascism and Stop Violence in the Name of Religion.
2. My Take:
The clerics of Islam ( Mullahs, Maulvies, Muftis, et al ) are as mean, sick, and cruel, as can be. They ought to be ashamed of themselves, but shame is Not felt by them in the least. It is shocking that Islamic clerics have to resort to this kind of bull-sh** to survive.
3. Moslems have been honing their warfare skills for 1400 years. During the 14 centuries, they have perfected their art of savagery. What we have from the record of history, is the horror show of Islam. Islam has been menacing Non-Moslem societies for 1400 years, and will continue its wreckage & demotion of Non-Moslem societies, until it is annihilated completely.
4. Moslems have been prospering at the expense of Non-Moslem civilized societies. Why should they abandon their predatory techniques, which have been working like gang-busters for them?
Mullahs & Maulvies call Islam the religion of Peace, Love, & Brotherhood. They keep parrotizing about the perfection of Islam. They are first class hypocrites, and these statements make them look ridiculous.
Surinder Paul Attri

Tuesday, May 20, 2008


Dear All, c
I think BJP is absolutely right in objecting to the pictures of Mrs Sonia Gandhi appearing in the advertisements placed by the Government of India or its agencies It is a very wrong practice and should be avoided. This principle should extend to all political outfits in power.. First of all, Mrs Sonia Gandhi is only a manager of a political party She is holding no official postion within the present ruling administration. and can not speak on behalf of the administration one way or the other. If the present Congress does not have any photogenic faces in the party then they should not use Mrs Sonia Gandhi's face just becasue of its photogenic qualities,.as a promotor of products or services or projects. This practice goes back to pre 1947 era.and should dis Devinder Thakur
2. My Take:Congress has broken with Hindu ( Indian ) symbols, and has formed its own cult, of observing rites of worshipping their white overlords. Placing emphasis on lighter-skin persons, rather than on devotion & dedication, to the betterment of India, is a rearward action. Congress seems to be somersaulting backward, toward pre-1947 era. It is a collection of thinking that Congress incorporates in itself.
3. Congress is on the wrong side, its thinking is reversed & remiss. Slow-witted Congressites would be well-advised, to get out of their retrogressive thinking, move frontward, and do something for the good of India.
Surinder Paul Attri

Sunday, May 18, 2008


1. For far too long priests and preachers have completely ignored the vicious criminal acts that the Bible promotes. The so called “God” of the Bible makes Osama Bin Laden look like a Boy Scout. This God, according to the Bible, is directly responsible for many mass-murders, rapes, pillage, plunder, slavery, child abuse and killing, not to mention the killing of unborn children. I have included references to the Biblical passages, so grab your Bible and follow along.
2. It always amazes me how many times this God orders the killing of innocent people even after the Ten Commandments said “Thou shall not kill”. For example, God kills 70,000 innocent people because David ordered a census of the people (1 Chronicles 21). God also orders the destruction of 60 cities so that the Israelites can live there. He orders the killing of all the men, women, and children of each city, and the looting of all of value (Deuteronomy 3). He orders another attack and the killing of “all the living creatures of the city: men and women, young, and old, as well as oxen sheep, and asses” (Joshua 6).
3. In Judges 21, He orders the murder of all the people of Jabesh-gilead, except for the virgin girls who were taken to be forcibly raped and married. When they wanted more virgins, God told them to hide alongside the road and when they saw a girl they liked, kidnap her and forcibly rape her and make her your wife! Just about every other page in the Old Testament has God killing somebody!
In 2 Kings 10:18-27, God orders the murder of all the worshipers of a different god in their very own church! In total God kills 371,186 people directly and orders another 1,862,265 people murdered.
4. The God of the Bible also allows slavery, including selling your own daughter as a sex slave (Exodus 21:1-11), child abuse (Judges 11:29-40 and Isaiah 13:16), and bashing babies against rocks (Hosea 13:16 & Psalms 137:9).
This type of criminal behavior should shock any moral person. Murder, rape, pillage, plunder, slavery, and child abuse can not be justified by saying that some god says it’s OK.
Jesus also promoted the idea that all men should castrate themselves to go to heaven: "For there are eunuchs, that were so born from their mother's womb: and there are eunuchs, that were made eunuchs by men: and there are eunuchs, that made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it." (Matthew 19:12 ASV) I don't know why anyone would follow the teachings of someone who literally tells all men to cut off their privates.
5 The God of the Bible also was a big fan of ritual human sacrifice and animal sacrifice.
And just in case you are thinking that the evil and immoral laws of the Old Testament are no longer in effect, perhaps you should read where Jesus makes it perfectly clear: "It is easier for Heaven and Earth to pass away than for the smallest part of the letter of the law to become invalid." (Luke 16:17 NAB)
6. I know that most Christians believe that God is a good and loving god, and wants people to do good things. I believe that most people want to do good things and behave morally. I also believe that many Christians haven’t really read the Bible, or just read certain passages in church. This is understandable, as the Bible is hard to read due to its archaic language and obscure references. Also many priests and preachers don’t like to read certain passages in the Bible because they present a message of hate not love.
7. But that does not alter the reality that, there are lots of nasty things in the Bible,
that are usually not talked about by priests and preachers. In short, Bible is Evil.
Surinder Paul Attri


1. Almost all the terrorists found around the world today, are Moslems. All the Terrorists die with a KORAN in their bags or leaving a video clip holding a Koran in their hands.
Mullahs are polite people, especially when it comes to the life of a Moslem, but they could not care less, if a Kafir has been eliminated.
Example: Al Aksa Brigades appologized for Killing an Arab, when ALL THEY ACTUALLY WANTED WAS TO KILL A JEW.
Who EXPRESSED SORROW??? ARAFAT?If ARAFAT was not behind the act--why did he have to apologize?!
2. Bin Laden is Talking about WORLD JIHAD, he is even reminding us about the defeat of the Spanish, at the hands of the Moors.
Islamic-Terror is highly organized and has three levels of operation:3. Level # One: This is the Lowest-Level, and involves the services of Zombie-Shahids ( Fighters ).
Level # Two: This is the Middle-Level. It uses the services of the Military-Organization, which provides infra-structure, funds, rewards, money laundering, communication, messages, training and technical know-how.
Level # Three: This is the Top-Level. It consists of Mullahs, Maulvies, and other theocratic dogma ideologues of Islam. This is the gang that brain-washes the working-troops of terrorism, writes FATWAS and Religious-Edicts, that support & justify the Terrorist & Jehadic acts conducted in the name of Islam, and in support of Laws of Allah.
4. These FATWAS and Religious-Edicts, are the “ TORA TORA TORA “ of Islam.
Surinder Paul Attri

Friday, May 16, 2008


From: Texan0001To: BHingoSent: 5/16/2008 4:58:57 P.M. Central Daylight Time

AMERICANS? This is very interesting! We all need to read it from start to finish......... and send it on to anyone who will read it.Maybe this is why our American Muslims are so quiet and not speaking out about any atrocities..Can a good Muslim be a good American? This question was forwarded to a friend who worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years. The following is his reply:Theologically - no. . . . Because his allegiance is to Allah, The moon God of Arabia.Religiously - no. . . . Because no other religion is accepted by His Allah except Islam ( Quran, 2:256) (Koran).Scripturally - no. . . . Because his allegiance is to the five Pillars of Islam and the Quran.Geographically - no. . . . Because his allegiance is to Mecca , to which he turns in prayer five times a day.Socially - no. . . . Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews.Politically - no. . . .. Because he must submit to the mullahs (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and destruction of America, the great Satan.Domestically - no. . . Because he is instructed to marry four women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Quran 4:34). Intellectually - no. . . . Because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles, and he believes the Bible to be corrupt. Philosophically - no. . . Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran do not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic. Spiritually - no. . . . Because when we declare "one nation under God," the Christian's God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as Heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in The Quran's 99 excellent names. Therefore after much study and deliberation, perhaps weshould be very suspicious of ALL MUSLIMS in this country. They obviously cannot be both "good" Muslims and good Americans. * * * Call it what you wish; it's still the truth. * * * You had better believe it. * * * The more who understand this, the better it will be for our country and our future. The religious war is bigger than we know or understand. And Barack Hussein Obama, a Muslim, wants to be our President? You HAVE to be kidding?! Wake up America ! Obama even says if he wins the election, he will be sworn in on the Quran (Koran)---not the Bible!


1. For each Hindu hurt kill ten of them. It is the force they understand... they are laaton key bhoot, or just give in to them & offer them a temple & a woman, man & child each day to satisfy their addiction for violence.
2. My Take:
What we are talking about here is:THE DOCTRINE OF RECIPROCITY

3. In practical terms, it means the application of RATIO-TECHNIQUE. That is, for each Hindu killed, by either a Sulla or a Kharista, 20 Sullas or Kharistas ( as the case may be ) shall be eliminated. This kind of practical response, gets the message across to both the Sullas & Kharistas, pretty damn fast.

4. Regarding: " LAATON KE BHOOT "" Laaton Ke Bhoot, Baaton Se Nahin Maante "" Laaton Ke Bhoot " need a Kick In The A**, believe you me. Nothing else will work with the " Laaton Ke Bhoot . " Without this kick in the A** of the Sullas & the Kharistas, we Hindus shall be taking sh** from both Moslems & Christians, nearly for ever.Fortunately, Hindus are the stronger section of the Indian society ( and of other societies as well ). They are higher educationally, intellectually, in skill-level, earning power, and financial resources, when compared with both Sullas & Kharistas. In other words, Hindus have more muscles than, either the Sullas or the Kharistas. Still the Hindu is taking sh** from both Sullas & Kharistas. Why ?Because, the Hindus are Not using their muscle. It is just that simple.

5. I Totally & Un-Equivocally reject the notion that:Real Hindus are found " only " in Gujerat.Real Hindus are all over the place in India, but there is no body out there ( any where in India ) to connect them, for the Raksha ( Protection ) of Hindu Interests.
Surinder Paul Attri
1. The Pope ( Rat zinger )
rules out feminist theology
By Malcolm Moore in Rome
Last Updated: 2:17am GMT 01/03/2008 --Telegraph, UK
The Vatican has cracked down on feminist interpretations of the liturgy, ruling that God must always be recognised as Our Father.
In a move designed to counter the spread of gender-neutral phrases, the Holy See said that anyone baptised using alternative terms, such as "Creator", "Redeemer" and "Sanctifier" would have to be re-baptised using the traditional ceremony.
The Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith said yesterday: "These variations arise from so-called feminist theology and are an attempt to avoid using the words Father and Son, which are held to be chauvinistic."
Instead, it said that the traditional form of "Father, Son and Holy Ghost" had to be respected.
The alternative phrases originated in North America and started to become popular only in the past few years.
The new phrases are particularly popular in the Church of England. It was recently reported that guidelines to bishops and priests advised them to avoid "uncritical use of masculine imagery".
The Catholic Church and the Church of England are split over feminist issues.
The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, and the Pope, met in Rome last year, but admitted that the ordination of women priests was a "serious obstacle" to closer ties.
The Pope, who wrote the latest ruling, has been a strong opponent of feminism in the Catholic Church.
In his book, The Ratzinger Report, he wrote: "I am, in fact, convinced that what feminism promotes in its radical form is no longer the Christianity that we know; it is another religion."
Rosemary Radford Ruether, a professor of feminist theology at the Graduate Theological Union in California, said that among "liberal" Catholics, the Pope "is not our Pope".
The Vatican said anyone baptised under the feminist terms could invalidate their marriage. Cardinal Urbano Navarrete, who wrote a formal commentary on yesterday's ruling, gave warning that anyone who attempted to baptise someone with a gender-neutral form would be penalised. "It is seriously illegitimate and unjust," he said.
Monsignor Antonio Miralles, a professor at the Pontifical Holy Cross University, said the new baptism "subverts faith in the Trinity" because it does not make the relationship between the three persons clear. "God is eternally Father in relation to His only begotten Son, who is not eternally Son except in relation to the Father."
Meanwhile, the Pope also spoke out against gay marriage and abortion before his first trip to the United States before Easter. He praised Americans who respected the "institution of marriage, acknowledged as a stable union between a man and a woman".
2. My Take:
This is an illustration of the stupidity of Pope Ratzinger. It represents his commitment to the traditional form of Christianity, based on:
Father, Son, and Holy Ghost
3. From Day One of its existence, Christianity was activated as a Patriarchal form of Ideology. Patriarchy has been the bulwark of Christianity. It is a legalized form of crime against Woman. It adds to numerous other crimes that Christianity has committed during the centuries, in the destruction of learning, oppression of science, recognized ( and un-recognized ) polygamy of man, denial of rights to woman, to a share in the government and other shameful deeds of Christianity. This is what is known as the Christian civilization ( if you can call it civilization, in reality it is barbarism ).
4. The crimes & criminals of Christianity, are born out of the teachings of Christianity, of which the Christian-Church & imbeciles like Pope Ratzinger, are the prime-movers.
Christianity is suffused with bigotry, is the enemy of Liberty, and of the suffrage of women, Christianity has invented things that did not exist, Christianity has murdered hundreds of millions of Pagan people, during the campaign of Christianization. Christianity now is trying spread its prison-house, to the streets of India. It is now trying to impose its barbarism & injustices upon Hindus, who have never known these injustices & inhumanities before.
Surinder Paul Attri

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Jihad's evil fury

1. Jihad's evil fury
The Pioneer Edit Desk Jammu to Jaipur, there's a pattern
Tuesday's ghastly serial bombings in Jaipur, coming in the wake of a surge in cross-border terrorism, are a grim reminder that our internal security situation continues to remain precarious. The bombings, which have extracted a terrible toll of innocent lives and maimed scores of others, also bear evidence of the fact that the evil forces of jihad, operating out of Pakistan or through front organisations in Bangladesh, are neither down nor out. On the contrary, after a brief lull in their murderous activities, they have struck with venomous fury, first in Jammu and now in Jaipur. These are neither stray attacks nor have the targets been chosen at random: It is obvious that there is a pattern to the recrudescence of cross-border terrorism and the Pakistani establishment is involved in it. Witness the manner in which the Pakistani Rangers provided covering fire for terrorists trying to sneak into Jammu & Kashmir, violating the terms of the ceasefire that has been in place since the NDA days. Treacly statements of condemnation and concern by individual Pakistani leaders should not distract us from this fact. As in the recent past, the jihadis behind the bombings in Jaipur chose their targets -- crowded places, including a Hanuman Mandir where devotees had gathered on Tuesday evening -- with great care to ensure maximum casualties. We have seen this in Delhi, Varanasi, Mumbai, Malegaon, Hyderabad, Lucknow and other places. It is not entirely coincidental that many of these jihadi attacks have been carried out on Tuesdays -- for example, the fidayeen raid on the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya on July 5, 2005, and the bombing of Sankat Mochan Mandir in Varanasi on March 7, 2006. The intention is to instigate a communal backlash. Nor is it coincidental that the latest jihadi outrage should have occurred in States where Assembly elections are due later this year. Heightened terrorism in Jammu & Kashmir would boost the sagging morale of the separatists while in Rajasthan, which has been largely spared terrorist depredations till now, it could create social rifts. This would serve the purpose of those who stoke jihad's deadly flames; as for the jihadis, their blighted cause is served every time they inflict death and destruction in the name of Islam.
There is no percentage in berating the Congress or blaming the UPA Government for their abysmal failure in fighting Islamist terror. When an effete Prime Minister signals surrender by offering to reward the families of jihadis killed by security forces and spends sleepless nights worrying over the fate of suspected terrorists, when the Government slyly withdraws forces from Jammu & Kashmir and subverts the Intelligence Bureau for political purposes, when a pathetically clueless Home Minister seeks to justify the inexplicable delay in sending the convicted mastermind behind the terrorist attack on Parliament House to his justly deserved death, and when a cynical Congress forces the scrapping of an effective anti-terrorism law to appease those who are not discomfited by the sight of horrific bloodshed, terrorists are bound to feel emboldened. The UPA Government will be loath to admit it, but more people have died in terrorist attacks in the past four years than during the six years the NDA was in power. It is equally true that there are more home-grown jihadis today than ever before. The import of these two facts will be lost only on those whose hearts don't beat for India.

2. My Take:
Tuesday’s bombings in Jaipur, are the result not only, of Moslem’s barbarism against the Hindu, but are the consequence of Hindu’s failure & foible to interdict, the Moslem’s barbarism. The Moslem’s teeth have not been cut.
3. The barbaric Moslem has not been punished nor warned, nor sent a message:
“ Keep off the Hindu. Keep off the Hindu’s life, property, and his religious exemplars, or the system of Islam, shall be brought to an end in India. “
4. Millions of Moslems are in the employ of the Hindu ( many of them are using Hindu names, to keep their jobs ), they are dependent on the Hindu, for their very survival. These Moslems are addicted to eating ( and drinking ). But the cup of tea has not been dashed off their lips, and the Moslems have not been shut out of the employ of the Hindu. In other words, the Moslems have not been kicked in the A**, and their wings have not been clipped.
5. Is there any question in any Hindu’s mind, that a point-blank counteraction of Moslem’s barbarism needs to be done? This kind of action has not been undertaken. Ratio technique has not been applied, that is,
“ For each Hindu murdered by the Moslems, twenty Moslems shall be eliminated. “
6. What are we Hindus waiting for ? Is some divine power going to save us Hindus, from the barbarism of the Moslem ?
Surinder Paul Attri

Sunday, May 11, 2008

Prophet Of Terror

Subj: Prophet Of Terror
1. "I have been made victorious through terror."
-- Muhammad, founder of Islam

2. My Take:
Hazrat Mohammad, Prophet Of Islam, was a Prophet Of Terror, but Moslems stand him out as “ The Apostle Of Peace. “
What a joke ?
3. A glance at Mohammad’s Exploits, shows that he cannot be denied this title of distinction ( Prophet Of Terror ).
“ When Mohammed first started screaming from the rooftops that he alone had the divine word of God, the people of Mecca ignored him. However, when he started insulting and defaming the religion of the peace loving Meccans, they couldn't take it anymore and tried persuading him to stop. Mohammed the coward was too scared of the growing hostility against him and instead of calling upon his Allah to strike down the Meccans, he crept out one night and fled for his life.
Ever since that incident, Mohammed was determined to take revenge on the Meccans. He escaped to Medinah, which had a sizeable Jewish population, and started plotting his revenge with a small gang of criminals. This was the beginning of Mohammed's trail of violence, hatred and bloodshed that would soon destroy the once flourishing culture of Arabia. The story has been documented in detail by his biographers, - surprise raids on trade caravans and tribal settlements, the use of plunder thus obtained for recruiting an ever growing army of greedy desperados, assassinations of opponents, blackmail, expulsion and massacre of the Jews of Medinah, attack and enslavement of the Jews of Khayber, rape of women and children, sale of these victims after rape, trickery, treachery and bribery employed to their fullest extent to grow the numbers of his religion Islam which ironically was supposed to mean "Peace"! He organised no less than 86 expeditions, 26 of which he led himself. “
The motives of the converts to Islam was never in any doubt. As D.S. Margoliouth states in his book “ Muhammad and the rise of Islam.”
4. Question: Was there any moralizing outcome on the Arabian society, as a result of Mohammad’s teachings ?
Answer: The “ only “ consequence of Mohammad’s teachings was demoralizing of the whole Arabian society.
When he was at the head of the Robber community, it is probable that the demoralising influence began to be felt; it was then that men who had never broken an oath learnt that they might evade their obligations, and that men to whom the blood of their clan had been as their own, began to shed it with impunity in the "cause of god". And that lying and treachery in the cause of Islam received divine approval. It was then too that Moslems became distinguished by the obscenity of their language. It was then too, that the coveting of goods and wives possessed by Non-muslims was avowed without discouragement from the Prophet...."
One should note that every time the "Apostle of Peace" committed one of his criminal onslaughts, he always justified the crimes by quickly claiming a "divine revelation" which conveniently removed the blame from his bloodied hands.
5. A sample of Mohammad’s deeds shows utter disregard of moral, scruple and conscience, on the part of Mohammad. His un-yielding focus was on the hatred of the Non-Moslem Infidels ( labeled by him as Kafirs/Hateful-Kafirs ), profusely-illustrated in his Gospel Of Hate ( Quran )
Four UNARMED merchants were traveling to Mecca to sell their goods consisting of raisins, honey and animal skins. It was the holy month of Rejeb which was considered sacred for trade in Arabia. It was a point of honor that any form of warfare or violence was strictly forbidden in this month. Mohammed's gang attacked the helpless men from behind and stabbed two of them to death. They plundered all the goods as booty and Mohammed got one fifths of the share.
The Prophet of Islam did not possess a shred of pity or kindness, or the slightest sense of justice. He cold-bloodedly murdered two innocent people who had never done him any harm and did not even know him! All this was done in a month that the Prophet himself declared was a sacred month in which no warfare should take place. Mohammed was obviously motivated by nothing but hatred and greed.
Conveniently divine revelations came down from Allah that absolved him of all the guilt.
6. Mohammad had no interest in any pacification or peaceful resolution of disputes or disagreements. His interest was in war & belligerence against the Hateful-Kafirs. Mohammad tells his Moslems in the Quran that:
"Warfare is ordained for you, though it is hateful unto you; but it may happen that you hate a thing which is good for you and it may happen that you love a thing which is bad for you. Allah knoweth, you knew not."
Notice here that Mohammed is completely removing all blame from himself, for having started the fighting. The most insidious and devilish implication of this verse is that Allah is completely justifying Mohammed's murder of the innocent Meccans. Over and above this Mohammed is conveniently implying that warfare is hateful to him, but he participated in it because it was ordained by Allah! What sacrifices the "Apostle of Peace" had to make!
7. Numerous chronicles of history, describing Hazrat Mohammad’s wars can be cited, to demonstrate clearly that:
Hazrat Mohammad was Not an apostle of peace, as Moslems would like you to believe, but that:
Hazrat Mohammad was a Prophet Of Terror.
Moslems are too dumb to realize that they have received a Bum-Dope.
Surinder Paul Attri

Saturday, May 10, 2008

Kashmiri-Hindu who is empathizing with MF Hussain

Subj: Kashmiri-Hindu who is empathizing with MF Hussain
1. Dear Friends, Please read below how a so-called learned Kashmiri Hindu brother empathized with MF Hussain and is calling the Hindus opposing Hussain as : "largely ignorant crowd". He should be sent to an Islamic state to preside over cases and pass such judgements, to defend artists drawing pictures of Mohammad!!! I feel if he did that in a country like Pakistan or the Middle-East or even in a part of India where Muslims are in majority, he would be running for his and his family's life!! Ghar chhoot gaya, phir bhi anti-Hindu maansikta nahin gayee!! (I do not think Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul has any family left in Kashmir ) Hope nobody takes it personally! I wanted to share with you; I know you would be equally offended, as I was with this verdict!! Regards, Bharat

2. My Take:
The ignorance of such Kashmiri-HIndus, is beyond measure. Even tow-truck drivers are smarter than, these perversely-untutored Hindus, who are spreading falsehood & suppressing truth. These are the kinds of Hindus, who have ( in the past ) assisted the Moslems to invade Hindu lands ( and masscre untold number of Hindus ).

3. Hindus need to clean up their house, from the curse of such un-schooled & un-worldly Hindus. Without this kind of clean-up, the Kismet ( destiny ) of the Hindu, shall be in depression & melancholy.

Surinder Paul Attri