Saturday, August 22, 2009

Seeds of Pakistan


Subj: Seeds of Pakistan
Pakistan's Jihadi Politics rooted in India Partition
http://worldmonitor.wordpress.com/
S. Dutta - Ventura County Star

As Pakistan marks the 62nd anniversary of its founding this month, it remains mired in existential conflicts.

Outsiders are often perplexed at how the Pakistan government can engage in state-sponsored terrorism and harboring of jihadi militants while claiming partnership with America in the fight against terrorism.

For those familiar with colonial history of British India, Pakistan’s emergence as a dangerous and destabilizing force was Pakistan’s destiny.

The seeds were sown in 1940 by those who exploited Islam to gain political power and eventually secured Pakistan from the British Empire in 1947.

Formation of Pakistan was neither assured nor certain. Mohammad Ali Jinnah, the champion of Pakistan, could hardly be called a Muslim in any sense. Famous for his expensively tailored Savile Row suits, educated at Lincoln Inn, he was a highly successful and extremely wealthy lawyer. He ate pork, drank alcohol and could barely speak Urdu, the language of pride for Indian Muslims.

Similarly, Muslim League’s creators were an amalgamation of royalists and feudal landlords who were loyal to the British Empire and never commanded ordinary Muslims’ attention and support. Under their stewardship, Pakistan was a mere fantasy. In fact, 10 years before Partition of India and the departure of the British, Muslim League and Jinnah were on the verge of political extinction.

In 1937, the Muslim League had failed miserably in pre-colonial Indian provincial elections. The results demonstrated that the party claiming to represent Muslims did not speak for Muslims — it received 4.8 percent of the Muslim vote even with separate electorates for Muslims and Hindus instituted by British colonialists.
The Nationalist Congress party, dominated by Hindus but still largely secular in nature, swept the elections. Jinnah, the supreme leader of Muslim League, who had started as a rising star in Congress in 1905 with impeccable secular credentials, became marginalized.

For political survival, Jinnah began blatant use of religion to gain support of Muslim masses with highly incendiary slogans, frightening the masses that Hindus were going to destroy the Muslims after the British left India.
Jinnah propounded his deceitful theory of Hindus and Muslims being “two separate nations” that could not live together and asked for creation of Pakistan, a land for Muslims, by division of India.

Rift in divided Indian society

His party’s incendiary slogan of “Islam in danger” created a tremendous rift in divided Indian society; cities and towns burned with communal violence.

The violence was instigated by Muslim League with tacit support of its national leaders through their paramilitary League National Guard goons and resulted in massive Hindu retaliation.

Thousands were butchered and tens of thousands made homeless. Once unleashed, the bloody monster of religious hatred was on its unimpeded march.
Jinnah’s chauvinistic propaganda and contrived ethnic conflict so effectively mobilized the Muslim population that, in a short period of seven years, the Muslim League went from winning less than 5 percent to more than 75 percent of the Muslim vote in provincial elections of 1945.

It took only two more years for the country to be divided on the basis of religious hatred and massive violence.

Jinnah’s pathological politics resulted in a horrendous bloodbath. The Partition resulted in one of the most brutal and bloody forced migrations in history, in which Sikhs and Hindus were chased from newly created Pakistan and Muslims from India.

The ensuing violence resulted in the massacre of some 2 million Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs and expulsion of approximately 17 million people from their homes.
The Machiavellian policies of Pakistan are the legacy of the holocaust accompanying the Partition.
We are still reaping the bitter fruit of poisonous seeds Jinnah and the Muslim League planted in 1940s.
At the dawn of the 21st century, the world stands on the brink due to two nuclear powers perpetually in conflict.

There have been four major wars between India and Pakistan and the two nations have come perilously close to nuclear war after Pakistani-sponsored terrorists attacked the Indian parliament in 2001.

Nascent Pakistan was insecure and fearful of its larger neighbor India and immediately adopted three basic constructs as her reason for existence: India as the enemy, Partition as unfinished business, and search for allies.This misdirected focus resulted in authoritarian, centralized rule, lack of rapprochement with India and a perpetual state of militarization and war.

Macchiavellian deals

The never-ending search for allies against India resulted in Pakistani dictators and autocratic leaders making Machiavellian deals that further radicalized religious fanatics and later resulted in unholy alliances with al-Qaida and the Taliban.

Since Pakistan felt it had been shortchanged in Partition (deprived of Kashmir, a state with a Muslim majority), and it was militarily weak, it engaged in a war of attrition in Kashmir by supporting jihadi terrorists through Pakistan military. The shacklehold of Pakistan military on domestic and foreign policy ensured that peace would remain elusive between India and Pakistan.

Additionally, Pakistan sought to destabilize and control Afghanistan utilizing militant Islamists, accepted money from the fundamentalist Saudi Arabia regime for militant religious schools, developed nuclear weapons to counter Indian military superiority and sold her services to the larger military powers with the eventual goal of countering and destabilizing India.

While Pakistan is being riven by the Taliban and Islamic militants, the ruling elite still consider India as her primary enemy!

Fundamentalists in the Pakistani military created the Taliban, supported and harbored al-Qaida, and possibly made nuclear weapon technology deals with North Korea.

Pakistani political vision has been frozen in 1947 and remains stunted due to Pakistan’s fixation over Kashmir.

As a result, 62 years after her independence, Pakistan stands as a state perpetually at war with herself and with her own citizens.

Machiavellian policies that used Islamic militants in Afghanistan and Kashmir have begun their blowback as terrorists blow people up in Lahore and Islamabad, jihadis train killers to launch attacks in Mumbai and elsewhere, and the Taliban expands its control and continues its march within Pakistan.
Besides fighting the Taliban in Swat, the Pakistan military battles nationalists and separatists in Balochistan and the Northwestern Province. Pakistan continues to struggle to imagine itself as a nation, to find a coherent self.

Bad situation

As Pakistan celebrated her independence Aug. 14, it is instructional to focus on U.S. soldiers fighting the Pakistani-trained and sheltered Taliban in Afghanistan.

While our military bombs militants in western Pakistan and we line the pockets of the Pakistani establishment in return, the weak government of President Asif Ali Zardari vacillates between serving its U.S. financers and homegrown jihadi ideologues obsessed with Kashmir and control of Afghanistan.

Nothing good can come of this.

Pakistan may be hopelessly corrupt, lawless, drug-ridden and inherently unstable, but it is here to stay. Despite being brainwashed by their rulers, Pakistani people have time and again rejected Islamic fundamentalists and remain remarkably open and tolerant.

It is time for their leaders to step out of their insecure cocoons and focus on development of Pakistan. If the rulers of Pakistan will not detach themselves from their poisonous origin, we can expect continual wars by proxies, jihadi politics and perpetual suffering in south Asia for years to come.

— S. Dutta, Ph.D., lives in Agoura.
Courtesy: VenturaCountyStar

2. My Take:
Quote: Formation of Pakistan was neither assured nor certain. Mohammad Ali Jinnah, the champion of Pakistan, could hardly be called a Muslim in any sense. Famous for his expensively tailored Savile Row suits, educated at Lincoln Inn, he was a highly successful and extremely wealthy lawyer. He ate pork, drank alcohol and could barely speak Urdu, the language of pride for Indian Muslims.

COMMENT: Yes, Jinnah was a Jack-Moslem by standards of Mullahs & Maulvies. But he was no dummy. He was a smart cat and Dr.Sir Mohammad Iqbal knew that. Dr.Iqbal solicited Jinnah to return to India ( from London ), as without him, Pakistan has no chance of coming into being. Jinnah returned to India. Rest is history..

3. Quote:
The seeds ( of Pakistan ) were sown in 1940 by those who exploited Islam to gain political power and eventually secured Pakistan from the British Empire in 1947.

COMMENT: According to Jinnah: Pakistan was born on the day, when the first Hindu was converted to Islam.

Surinder Paul Attri

Thursday, August 20, 2009

Shah Rukh Khan

Subj: Shah Rukh Khan
1. Chaudhari Sahib:
Regarding
Shah Rukh Khan's ( SRK ) problems at New York:airpot:

SRK ought to face the facts as they are, and not hit out at adventitious factors. US Immigration Officials and Airport employees, have no reason to either harass or hound SRK. There were at least six other persons in the same room, waiting check-up procedures. Every one of them has to wait his turn. Why should SRK be put ahead of anybody ? Who does SRK think he is, to be put ahead of anybody ? In the US airports, everybody is equal, he is in the same pot, and has to wait his check-out turn, That is about the size of it.

2. Airport employees did not mis-treat SRK. They only followed SOPs ( standard operation procedures ), designed for public protection.

SRK brought problems on himself, by his poor answers to simple questions. His Karma and the Karma of his Evil Islam caught up with him.

Laws of Karma tell us that, results & consequences follow, the actions done previously. No body can defy the laws of Karma.

3. Airport procedures have been refined repeatedly. Airport computers & Airport employees have been programmed & trained to look for suspicious persons & suspicious, slippery & ambiguous activities in the airport area. Of course the name Khan would alert airport computers immedietly
( there are too many Khans out there, whose claim to fame is, terrorism & suicide bombings ).

4. To an average Yank, the name Khan does not mean much, except the name Khan phonetically sounds like the name Con. To a Yank, Khan-Man sounds like Con-Man. He would sense potential trouble, and the Yank would say to himself : Watch out for this Bullet-Head.

Surinder Paul Attri.

Saturday, August 15, 2009

Jesus: Will He Ever Return?

1. Jesus: Will He Ever Return?
My Take:
Jesus did not level with his followers. Regardless of what the Bible says or does not say, Jesus is Not returning. In fact, Jesus CANNOT return any more than Harry Houdini can. Christian Priests & Preachers try to impose Bible on the world, as a mass of truth & as the word of God. But before any thing can be admitted as proved by the Bible, the Bible itself must be proved to be true. But Bible itself has Not been proved to be true,it does not have any authority, and cannot be admitted as proof of anything. Bible Is A Book Of Fiction. Besides, there is plenty of wickedness in this PRETENDED word of God.

2. Bible is a book of lies, wickedness, and blasphemy. Can there ever be greater blasphemy than, to ascribe ( done by the Bible ) the wickedness of man, to the orders of Almighty ? Ten centuries of Biblical control of Europe, from the fifith to the fifteenth century, are called the DARKEST AGE, in the history of Europe.

3. Fictional sermons, based on the Bible, given by Christian Priests, to captive Christian audiences, is what goes on in the churches. But this fiction cannot be accepted or approved by anybody who is in his right mind.

Surinder Paul Attri

Friday, August 14, 2009

Response to message of Poonam Abbi

Subj: Response to message of Poonam Abbi
1. Poonam Abbi Jee: Thanks for your message to me.

Sure, there are some nice Moslems out there ( there are some nice Christians there too ), but their religons of Islam & Christianity, are a piece of Sh**.

2. Moslems & Christians gauge religion as a competitive business ( this attitude is sadly lacking in Hinduism ), They torture, rape, and loot Non-Moslem & Non-Christian, to snuff out hateful Kafirs. This is their method of choice, they regard it as fair game. But this approach is available to Hindus also. By not being competitive, Hindus are Not doing a favor to anybody, neither to Moslems, nor to Christians, nor to even Hindus.

3. By shrivelling from competition, and regarding it as un-interesting, or laborious, we are allowing the Moslems & Christians to multiply, and causing Hinduism to shrink in numbers. If it is not our own shortcoming, then whose is it ?

4. Our Rotten Hindu Leadership & 90 % of our HIndu Holy Men ( HHMs), have neither the understanding nor the talent to cope with, the competitive religious environment of today. And our own characteristics of Hindu Selfishness & Defensiveness, does not go to bat for Hinduism either.

Surinder Paul Attri

Response to message of Poonam Abbi

Subj: Response to message of Poonam Abbi
1. Poonam Abbi Jee: Thanks for your message to me.

Sure, there are some nice Moslems out there ( there are some nice Christians there too ), but their religons of Islam & Christianity, are a piece of Sh**.

2. Moslems & Christians gauge religion as a competitive business ( this attitude is sadly lacking in Hinduism ), They torture, rape, and loot Non-Moslem & Non-Christian, to snuff out hateful Kafirs. This is their method of choice, they regard it as fair game. But this approach is available to Hindus also. By not being competitive, Hindus are Not doing a favor to anybody, neither to Moslems, nor to Christians, nor to even Hindus.

3. By shrivelling from competition, and regarding it as un-interesting, or laborious, we are allowing the Moslems & Christians to multiply, and causing Hinduism to shrink in numbers. If it is not our own shortcoming, then whose is it ?

4. Our Rotten Hindu Leadership & 90 % of our HIndu Holy Men ( HHMs), have neither the understanding nor the talent to cope with, the competitive religious environment of today. And our own characteristics of Hindu Selfishness & Defensiveness, does not go to bat for Hinduism either.

Surinder Paul Attri

Response to message of Shri Chaudhari Jee

Subj: Response to message of Shri Chaudhari Jee
1. Attriji,

kiya kamaal kar diya hai aapne!

I admire your tribute to Hinduism: Tolerant Soul tolerates, treats and nurtures intolerant, prejudiced, hatemonger type of characters
within its own habitat and anywhere in the world.

No where else this can be seen to such an extent.

Don't you think we should assess this type of approach afresh now?

Regards


BK Chaudhari

2. My Take: Chaudhari Sahib: Thanks for your tribute.
Quote: kiya kamaal kar diya hai aapne!
COMMENT: Oh really ? But thanks. It makes me feel like a Field-Marshal.

3. Quote: Tolerant Soul tolerates, treats and nurtures intolerant, prejudiced, hatemonger type of characters
within its own habitat and anywhere in the world.
COMMENT: Our Shastras Clearly tell us that it is wicked to commit Evil, but it is absolutely wretched & awful to tolerate Evil.
Hindu is smart & does understand this difference, but does not want to pay the price of defending Dharma. He wants someone else to pay this price.
This does not mean that Hindu is some kind of fiend. Hindu is no such thing. Hindu's utter selfishness did not fall from the sky. Most of Hindu's complexes were developed between the years 1000 A.D. & 1500 A.D. and it is related to his sense of survival.

Consequently, Hindu's attitude is Defensive & his interest are Intensely-Directed INWARD. Hindu cannot pull himself out of his complexes, entirely through his own efforts.

4. What about Hindu Leadership ?
Our Hindu Leadership during the last 1200 years has been totally-Rotten. It is still totally Rotten. It does not have what it takes to do the job of Hinduism Defense.

5. What about our Hindu Holy Men ( HHM's ) ?
Ninety percent of our HHM's are Totally-Rotten. The Tommy-Rot that comes out of their mouths is idiotic and sinks the ship of Hinduism.They:
" Don't Know Which End Is Up."

6. Quote: Don't you think we should assess this type of approach afresh now?

COMMENT: Absolutely yes.
Chaudhari Sahib: We Hindus have been on the WRONG track for the last 1200 years. It is totally foolish to continue doing the same thing, and expecting different results. Different & Un-Conventional techniques are needed.

Having said that, I hasten to assure you that, Hindu's problems are Entirely-Solvable.
For reasons that are obvious, I cannot put my technique on the Internet, where it is visible to both friend & foe alike.

7. Religious business is Extremely-Competitive, and the present environment is DOGGY-DOG ( DOG-EAT-DOG ). You have to be careful & cautious. There are too many people out there, who do not wish us Hindus well, and they are extremely power-hungry.

Surinder Paul Attri

Thursday, August 13, 2009

10,000 Africans embrace Hindu Dharma in Ghana (Africa)

Subj: Re: [aryayouthgroup] 10,000 Africans embrace Hindu Dharma in Ghana (Africa)
1. This is very good news, Universal faith is having its impact, slowely but surely.
May the Great Bhagwan bless and continue to influence the Vedic (Hindu) faith..Kurwanto Vishwa Arayam....Let us enoble the world.
Pranam
2. My Take:
Islam is Not as un-conquerable as it is Cracked up to be ( Christianity is Not either ). In Africa, six million Moslems convert to Christianity Each year. Some of these Neophyte-Converts, can be moved onward into Hinduism.
3. If it has to be a Two-Step process, then let it be.
Surinder Paul Attri

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

Yeshu Ratnam

Subj: Yeshu Ratnam
1.

PEOPLE LIKE YESHU, KNOW NOTHING ABOUT HINDU AND HINDU CULTURE, YET THEY POUR POISON WITH THEIR PREJUDICE MIND, AGAINST HINDUS. !!

YOU ARE RIGHT, DR. BABU JI, PEOPLE LIKE HIM LIVE ON BORROWED BREAD, BORROWED CULTURED, BORROWED BRAINS, AND BORROWED MENTALITY.!!

THE GARBAGE COLLECTORS LIKE YESHU, ENJOY THE STINK OF THEIR GARBAGE, AND HE SHOULD KEEP HIS GARBAGE WITH HIM, THE HINDU DOES NOT NEED HIS GARBAGE, AND NONSENSE. !

HE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND THAT, IT IS THE NOBLE, TOLERANT SOUL OF GREAT HINDU, THAT TOLERATES, TREATS, AND NURTURES, INTOLERANT, PREJUDICE, HATEMONGER, CHARACTERS LIKE HIM, IN INDIA. !!

GOD BLESS BHARAT. Lal
2. My Take:
Unrefined, Uncultured, Biased, and Bogoted, wacky nuts like Yeshu Ratnam. pick on Hinduism as infintum, but completely ignore the dark side of their Barbaric Christianity.
3. Unbalanced & Cracked nuts like Yeshu Ratnam, remain totally silent about the numerous forms of violence, slaughter, and torture perpetrated for centuries, in the name of Christianity. But their bigotry & narrow-mindedness comes through loud & clear.
4. If Yeshu Ratnam is entirely unaware of Christianity's savage character, then he is an Ignoramus. If not, then he is very very prejudiced, and completely alienated from the truth.
5. Yeshu Ratnam would be well-advised to " keep his big mouth shut. "

Surinder Paul Attri

Monday, August 10, 2009

Sulla's honor-killing

Subj: Sulla's honor-killing
1. No 'honour' in killings
http://www.torontosun.com/news/columnists/peter_worthington/2009/08/05/10363756-sun.html
... and it's a bizarre way to describe a barbaric practice aimed at women
By PETER WORTHINGTON
Why do they call it "honour killing"? It's anything but honourable.
Then again, it's like dictatorial tyrannies calling themselves "peoples' democracies" when they're neither for the people nor democratic.
The possible honour killings of four women found dead in a car in the Rideau Canal near Kingston would be only the latest manifestation of this obscenity.
The alleged perpetrators have been charged (including the father, mother and the girls' brother), and if found guilty will be due for a long stay in Canada ... in prison. Some "honour"!
So-called "honour killings" are a world-wide phenomenon, if not epidemic, peculiar mainly to the Mideast and Asia, where a family member (usually female) has supposedly brought dishonour to the family or clan that can only be expunged by the person's death.
Human rights and women's groups point out there's nothing in the Qur'an that dictates the murder of women for transgressions -- usually sexual, but not necessarily.
Often, under-age boys in the offended family are assigned to kill the female offender because as minors they will be treated more leniently.
Too often there's no penalty for the murderer(s). In some countries (Syria, Jordan, Egypt, Iran, Iraq) men who "honour" kill their wives (or daughters or sisters) for adultery, may be "exempt" from penalty.
Thousands of women are killed every year for reasons ranging from refusal to wear head coverings, to having a love poem written in their name, to having arguments over clothes.
There have been bizarre cases where a husband dreamed his wife was unfaithful, and so was thought justified in killing her. A girl in Turkey had her throat cut when her name was mentioned in a love poem on the radio.
National Geographic recalls that a mentally retarded girl in Pakistan who was raped, was subsequently executed because she supposedly brought shame to the tribe. A conservative estimate has three women per day subjected to honour killings in Pakistan.
A characteristic of honour killings is that the accused has no right of defence. There is no need to prove guilt -- the accusation alone is enough to bring dishonour that can only be removed by execution.
DOWRIES INSUFFICIENT
According to UNICEF, some 5,000 brides in India are killed annually because their dowries are too small. In Latin America, when women are murdered in "crimes of passion," it often results in a lesser penalty for their killers compared to other murders.
The UN's Human Rights Commission has recorded "honour killings" in Britain, Canada, the U.S., throughout Europe, Bangladesh, Ecuador, Brazil, Egypt, Italy, Morocco, Sweden, Turkey, Uganda.
In some countries, honour killing is a cultural institution -- Iran, Afghanistan, parts of Pakistan (where 1,000 women a year are victims).
It's difficult to determine the number of honour killings, since they can be disguised and the community often closes ranks. In India, young women who have supposedly dishonoured their family have been set on fire.
In theory, honour killings also apply to men, but are much more rare. In sexual offences, women are usually blamed for tempting men, or provoking their illicit sexual behaviour.
Strangely, perhaps, it is often women themselves who justify honour killings.
Similarly, some defend the burka or hijab as a matter of choice, and not as a symbol of subjection, subservience or male dominance.
If the murders of the four women in the submerged car in the Rideau Canal, which shocked the nation, were indeed honour killings, they are neither unique nor unusual among those familiar with the despicable practice, which shows few signs of being curtailed
2. My Take:
Rather than saving Sulla's face, honor-killing shames ( blackens ) his face. So called honor-killing is Sulla's Jehad against his relatives, for the worship & grandeur of his Uncivilized Allah. This murderous-measure is Dishonorable.in totu. To call it honor-killing, is travesty of truth. Sulla cannot hide behind sham & synthetic explanations.
Behold: Sulla's arse is showing.
Surinder Paul Attri

Tuesday, August 4, 2009

If you convert, you die

Subj: If you convert, you die
this is no cuse for celebration. she left one irrational abrahamic religion and converted to another one. sadly, christiantiy is a religion of feminism intertwined with the irrational ideology of hell fire and damnation for ALL non-christians. it's liberatin to a degree when compared to islam .... but it's skitsophrenic and it's an utterly vile and barbaric religion in and of itself and is NOT an improvement. this woman is a bafoon. i'd have more respect for her if she would've announced that she was an athiest or a budhist or something but NOT a christian. yuk!
My Take:
Agreed.
This assessment is valid because, she is jumping out of frying pan, but getting into fire.

She is getting out of Christianity, which is the foulest crime & deepest shame of Western civilization. But she is not getting into anything better. All Abramaic religions are basically intolerant, and their belief systems are built upon sewer.

Surinder Paul Attri

If You Convert You Die

Subj: If You Convert You Die
1. If You Convert You Die
Tuesday, 04 August 2009 03:16 Nonie Darwish
How Islamic vigilante justice, which enjoys almost complete impunity in Muslim countries, keeps dissidents and apostates of Islam in submission, which, although help keep the integrity of Islam intact, but creates chaotic society of fear, terror and violence in the Islamic world. Courageous Egyptian lawyer and women’s rights activist Nagla Al Imam's declaration of apostasy is a perfect case in point and what it portends to the West amidst it growing Muslim population...
2. My Take:
Quote: How Islamic vigilante justice, which enjoys almost complete impunity in Muslim countries, keeps dissidents and apostates of Islam in submission, which, although help keep the integrity of Islam intact, but creates chaotic society of fear, terror and violence in the Islamic world.
COMMENT: What Integrity does Islam have, to keep or stack ?
Islamic Vigilante Justice only promotes Islam's duplicity, double-talk, faultiness, haughty & high-handed savageness. Added contribution of this Islamic Justice, is generation of terror, fear, horror, chaos & confusion, inside Islamic societies.
Surinder Paul Attri