DEATH SENTENCE OF ISLAM ON EUROPE
By S.P. Attri ( USA )
------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Is Islam going to take over Europe in a few more decades, as predicted by Col. Gaddafi of Libya ? Is Islam going to steal this kind of quick march, all across Europe ? Is Europe going to be a blazing-wreck ? Does Europe have only a brief period more of rejoicing ?
The fear of this kind of potential " luck to be ," is stretching across Europe, and counter-forces have begun to kick in.
2. A Dutch politician, Geert Wilders released his film named FITNA ( Anti-Islamic movie ) about two years ago. Since that event, his popularity has been taking wings. There is no gimmick or catch in statements of Geert Wilders. He does not dodge but puts it straight out, that he wants to ban the Quran & Impose a tax on headscarves.
3. Some months ago, Geert was denied entry into Britain, stating that UK considers him a threat to the interests of the British society. As a consequence of this incident, however, his poll rating went up substantially. He still gets plenty of death-threats on a regular basis, from furious & fanatic Moslems, but a lot of Non-Moslem Dutch have begun to agree with him, and see lot of sense in what he is saying that:
" You see danger, before danger sees you. "
4. As it turned out, UK reversed its stand after a few months, & admitted Geert Wilders into Britain. As anticipated, a group of burnt-up Moslems were standing, in anticipation of his arrival, in front of the Parliament building. They shouted:
" Wilders, go to Hell."
They carried signs, saying:
" Islam will rule the world. "
5. Standing nearby, the reporters asked:
Mr. Wilders: Why do you want to ban the Quran ? Do you want to ban the Bible too ?
Wilders answered: Islam is Not a religion, but a fascist-ideology, and Quran is no different from Hitler's Mein Kampf. If Mein Kampf can be banned, then so can Quran, and it ought to be banned similarly. For good measure, Geert added Winston Churchill, who composed the same comparison.
6. Wilders says intrepidly that:
a. Dutch culture is better than that of the Moslems
b There is an Islamic invasion of Europe, unhidden & underway, at this time.
c. Moslems are spinning Europe into an Arab colony
d. Moslems pollute public space with their headscarves, their beards of hate, their burqas, & their mosques.
e. Wilders uses expressions such as " Moroccan Street Terrorists, " and " Islamization-Tsunami ."
f. Wilders says that he wants to " recapture " Netherland from the hands of Islamicists, street-by-street, and neighborhood-by-neighborhood.
7. Geert Wilders is a Dutch politician, but he wants to get a move on in Europe. He gets abundant death-threats. Any body who wants to meet with him, has to pass through X-Ray machines, as well as security check-points. He has been under police protection, for the last five years. He was the target of 303 death-threats out of a total of 424 death-threats, made against all Dutch politicians, last year.
FITNA, his Anti-Islamic film, was released in 2008, In 2009, he received the, Florida Security Council's Free Speech Award, and American Freedom Alliance's Hero Of Conscience Award.
8. This is Wilders success story. His party ( PVV ) has been leading in the polls for months, and he is featured on the cover page of several newspapers every day. On the Internet, every headline about Wilders, gets three times as many clicks, as other politicians. Wilders might well be un-stoppable. He certainly has a chance of becoming the Prime Minister of Netherland in 2011.
9. Geert Wilders: Keep the heat on !
Surinder Paul Attri
Monday, March 8, 2010
Friday, March 5, 2010
The violence and cruelty of Arabs often perplexes Westerners.
1. The violence and cruelty of Arabs often perplexes Westerners.
Not only does the leader of Hizbullah proclaim "We love death," but so too does, for example, a 24-year-old man who last month yelled "We love death more than you love life" as he crashed his car on the Bronx-Whitestone Bridge in New York City. As two parents in St. Louis honor-killed their teenage daughter with thirteen stabs of a butcher's knife, the Palestinian father shouted "Die! Die quickly! Die quickly! . . . Quiet, little one! Die, my daughter, die!" – and the local Arab community supported them against murder charges. A prince from Abu Dhabi recently tortured a grain dealer whom he accused of fraud; despite a video of the atrocity appearing on television internationally, the prince was acquitted while his accusers were convicted.
2. My Take:
It may be perplexing to Westerners, but it is Islam in the purest sense, ready to blast the hell out of Kafirs ( Non-Moslem Infidels ). According to Quran, Islam is the only true way of life ( the rest is fake ), as it has been prescribed jointly by Allah & Hazrat Mohammad. This is the way of Allah, for which the Moslems kill & get killed.
3. Islam is the best religion, according to Quran. Those who ignore the loving approach of Islam, incur the apostolic-wrath & the wrath of Allh. The acquittal of the prince, and conviction of accusers, in the above story, is pure & just by Sharia. A person cannot be a Moslem, without believing in Allah, Mohammad, & Sharia.
4. Islam is the biggest calamity that has fallen, or could have fallen on Kafirs. Yet, the proponents of Islam believe, and they want Non-Moslem Kafirs to believe that:
" Islam is a religion of Peace, Love, and Brotherhood. "
This is a " cock-and-bull story " and a " bull-sh** claim " that has been presented as a fact, with un-paralleled skill & imaginative literary words. It is a myth of monstrous proportions, because Hatred of Kafirs, is the biggest-pillar of Islam. If Moslems are really honest, they must not conceal the salient point of Quran, that:
" Kafirs are the enemies of Allah & denizens of Hell. "
5. Islam, as an ideology ( mis-construed as a religion ) is an expression of man's aggressive behavior.
Islam claims that world has been created by Allah ( who loves to be worshipped ), who revealed his will through his messenger Hazrat Mohammad. It was Allah who made laws & gave Mohammad instructions regarding government & morality, how people should walk, talk, eat, drink etc etc. This is the only true way of life, all else is fake. These are the legal decisions of Allah & the cornerstone of Islam.
6. Actually, these are man-made ( Mohammad-Made ) decisions & laws,maintained masterfully by Mohammad, in the cloak of revelation. It is Mohammad who wants to be worshipped as Allah, without being called so.
Mohammad wanted to maintain his dominant position, and spread his name. As a prophet mediating between Allah ( God ) and man, he gave his fictional story a supernatural character, and used this device, as a tool of dominance. But this dominance is Not possible without warfare. So Mohammad subjected his Moslems to severe military discipline, toughened & trained them, to act in a certain way, as a gang of fanatics, as followers of Islam.
7. The concept of dominance governed the entire life of Mohammad. But he did not want his urge of dominance to die with him, but to continue beyond his grave. So he declared that, he was the last prophet and any one coming after him, and declaring himself to be God's apostle, would be an imposter. For the same and similar reasons, Mohammad declared that, worshipping others with Allah ( called " Shirk " in Islam ), is an unpardonable sin.
8. Mohammad was surely capable of imagining such stories, to convert his humanity ( a mortal being ) into divinity, to make himself grow stronger & dominant. And Quran declares Mohammad as the model of behavior.
Truly, this is the world of Islam.
Surinder Paul Attri
Not only does the leader of Hizbullah proclaim "We love death," but so too does, for example, a 24-year-old man who last month yelled "We love death more than you love life" as he crashed his car on the Bronx-Whitestone Bridge in New York City. As two parents in St. Louis honor-killed their teenage daughter with thirteen stabs of a butcher's knife, the Palestinian father shouted "Die! Die quickly! Die quickly! . . . Quiet, little one! Die, my daughter, die!" – and the local Arab community supported them against murder charges. A prince from Abu Dhabi recently tortured a grain dealer whom he accused of fraud; despite a video of the atrocity appearing on television internationally, the prince was acquitted while his accusers were convicted.
2. My Take:
It may be perplexing to Westerners, but it is Islam in the purest sense, ready to blast the hell out of Kafirs ( Non-Moslem Infidels ). According to Quran, Islam is the only true way of life ( the rest is fake ), as it has been prescribed jointly by Allah & Hazrat Mohammad. This is the way of Allah, for which the Moslems kill & get killed.
3. Islam is the best religion, according to Quran. Those who ignore the loving approach of Islam, incur the apostolic-wrath & the wrath of Allh. The acquittal of the prince, and conviction of accusers, in the above story, is pure & just by Sharia. A person cannot be a Moslem, without believing in Allah, Mohammad, & Sharia.
4. Islam is the biggest calamity that has fallen, or could have fallen on Kafirs. Yet, the proponents of Islam believe, and they want Non-Moslem Kafirs to believe that:
" Islam is a religion of Peace, Love, and Brotherhood. "
This is a " cock-and-bull story " and a " bull-sh** claim " that has been presented as a fact, with un-paralleled skill & imaginative literary words. It is a myth of monstrous proportions, because Hatred of Kafirs, is the biggest-pillar of Islam. If Moslems are really honest, they must not conceal the salient point of Quran, that:
" Kafirs are the enemies of Allah & denizens of Hell. "
5. Islam, as an ideology ( mis-construed as a religion ) is an expression of man's aggressive behavior.
Islam claims that world has been created by Allah ( who loves to be worshipped ), who revealed his will through his messenger Hazrat Mohammad. It was Allah who made laws & gave Mohammad instructions regarding government & morality, how people should walk, talk, eat, drink etc etc. This is the only true way of life, all else is fake. These are the legal decisions of Allah & the cornerstone of Islam.
6. Actually, these are man-made ( Mohammad-Made ) decisions & laws,maintained masterfully by Mohammad, in the cloak of revelation. It is Mohammad who wants to be worshipped as Allah, without being called so.
Mohammad wanted to maintain his dominant position, and spread his name. As a prophet mediating between Allah ( God ) and man, he gave his fictional story a supernatural character, and used this device, as a tool of dominance. But this dominance is Not possible without warfare. So Mohammad subjected his Moslems to severe military discipline, toughened & trained them, to act in a certain way, as a gang of fanatics, as followers of Islam.
7. The concept of dominance governed the entire life of Mohammad. But he did not want his urge of dominance to die with him, but to continue beyond his grave. So he declared that, he was the last prophet and any one coming after him, and declaring himself to be God's apostle, would be an imposter. For the same and similar reasons, Mohammad declared that, worshipping others with Allah ( called " Shirk " in Islam ), is an unpardonable sin.
8. Mohammad was surely capable of imagining such stories, to convert his humanity ( a mortal being ) into divinity, to make himself grow stronger & dominant. And Quran declares Mohammad as the model of behavior.
Truly, this is the world of Islam.
Surinder Paul Attri
Thursday, March 4, 2010
VANGUARDS OF ISLAM
1.
Dear Surinder Ji
Shashi Tharoor could not have said all this entirely on his own because he was accompanying the P.M. to Saudi Arabia.
I suspect he was used as a tool to float this wonky idea as a trial baloon. Perhaps a sell out of Kashmir is on cards
regards
Ram
2. My Take: Shri Ohri Jee:
I believe you are right.
Shashi Tharoor is Not the boss, he is a Flunkey, and was tagging along with the boss ( the PM ) to Saudi Arabia.
3. Regarding Sell-Out of Kashmir: Your are right again.
As a consequence of our obedience to Phoney-Liberalism, Pakistan may capture on the table, what it has failed to grab militarily in the field, for over 60 years.
4. Both Shashi Tharoor & Dr. Manmohan Singh, are masters of Phoney-LIberalism. Appeasement of Pakistan and showering of privileges on the minorities ( Moslems & Christians ) and none on the Majority-Hindu, are both Phoney-Liberalism.
5. In my book, this a lousy-principle. Reason: Moslem is a Parasite on the Hindu. Hindu earns & Moslem eats. It is a gargantuan-harvest of Phoney-Liberalism.
6. Hell with Phoney-Liberalism !
Surinder Paul Attri
Dear Surinder Ji
Shashi Tharoor could not have said all this entirely on his own because he was accompanying the P.M. to Saudi Arabia.
I suspect he was used as a tool to float this wonky idea as a trial baloon. Perhaps a sell out of Kashmir is on cards
regards
Ram
2. My Take: Shri Ohri Jee:
I believe you are right.
Shashi Tharoor is Not the boss, he is a Flunkey, and was tagging along with the boss ( the PM ) to Saudi Arabia.
3. Regarding Sell-Out of Kashmir: Your are right again.
As a consequence of our obedience to Phoney-Liberalism, Pakistan may capture on the table, what it has failed to grab militarily in the field, for over 60 years.
4. Both Shashi Tharoor & Dr. Manmohan Singh, are masters of Phoney-LIberalism. Appeasement of Pakistan and showering of privileges on the minorities ( Moslems & Christians ) and none on the Majority-Hindu, are both Phoney-Liberalism.
5. In my book, this a lousy-principle. Reason: Moslem is a Parasite on the Hindu. Hindu earns & Moslem eats. It is a gargantuan-harvest of Phoney-Liberalism.
6. Hell with Phoney-Liberalism !
Surinder Paul Attri
1.
Dear Surinder Ji
Shashi Tharoor could not have said all this entirely on his own because he was accompanying the P.M. to Saudi Arabia.
I suspect he was used as a tool to float this wonky idea as a trial baloon. Perhaps a sell out of Kashmir is on cards
regards
Ram
2. My Take: Shri Ohri Jee:
I believe you are right.
Shashi Tharoor is Not the boss, he is a Flunkey, and was tagging along with the boss ( the PM ) to Saudi Arabia.
3. Regarding Sell-Out of Kashmir: Your are right again.
As a consequence of our obedience to Phoney-Liberalism, Pakistan may capture on the table, what it has failed to grab militarily in the field, for over 60 years.
4. Both Shashi Tharoor & Dr. Manmohan Singh, are masters of Phoney-LIberalism. Appeasement of Pakistan and showering of privileges on the minorities ( Moslems & Christians ) and none on the Majority-Hindu, are both Phoney-Liberalism.
5. In my book, this a lousy-principle. Reason: Moslem is a Parasite on the Hindu. Hindu earns & Moslem eats. It is a gargantuan-harvest of Phoney-Liberalism.
6. Hell with Phoney-Liberalism !
Surinder Paul Attri
Dear Surinder Ji
Shashi Tharoor could not have said all this entirely on his own because he was accompanying the P.M. to Saudi Arabia.
I suspect he was used as a tool to float this wonky idea as a trial baloon. Perhaps a sell out of Kashmir is on cards
regards
Ram
2. My Take: Shri Ohri Jee:
I believe you are right.
Shashi Tharoor is Not the boss, he is a Flunkey, and was tagging along with the boss ( the PM ) to Saudi Arabia.
3. Regarding Sell-Out of Kashmir: Your are right again.
As a consequence of our obedience to Phoney-Liberalism, Pakistan may capture on the table, what it has failed to grab militarily in the field, for over 60 years.
4. Both Shashi Tharoor & Dr. Manmohan Singh, are masters of Phoney-LIberalism. Appeasement of Pakistan and showering of privileges on the minorities ( Moslems & Christians ) and none on the Majority-Hindu, are both Phoney-Liberalism.
5. In my book, this a lousy-principle. Reason: Moslem is a Parasite on the Hindu. Hindu earns & Moslem eats. It is a gargantuan-harvest of Phoney-Liberalism.
6. Hell with Phoney-Liberalism !
Surinder Paul Attri
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Pakistan can never be India’s friend
1. Pakistan can never be India’s friend
Ravinder Raj
Union Home Minister P Chidambaram’s disgust for Pakistan’s hypocritical ways requires supplementation. As one of the surviving member of an ever-diminishing generation with pre-partition experience, I recall those days in 1947 when a few Muslim children below 16 years of age repeatedly raised two slogans during street processions in Lahore: Hans ke liya Pakistan, ab ladh ke lenge Hindustan. I am pretty sure that those boys must have grown up to be important people within the Pakistani establishment. I am sure that they were behind the Kargil infiltrations and had a hand in all the terror attacks in India till date, including the 26/11 attacks on Mumbai.
The Indian security apparatus should become more efficient in tackling terrorism. This can be achieved through superior intelligence gathering and prompt remedial measures. Our leadership must follow Chanakya’s doctrine of ‘tit for tat’ in dealing with Pakistan. The Government must become more proactive in cracking down on extremists and their supporters. Simultaneously, it must pursue policies to internationally isolate Pakistan. Also, the Government will do well to win over members of the Muslim community to act as agents of the state to check the spread of the jihadi activities. They could promptly report suspicious events and thereby act as eyes and ears of the Government.
There is no denying that constant vigilance should be our credo. For, our enemy is constantly thinking of ways to ‘bleed us dry with a thousand cuts’. No matter how much it tries to deny it, the Pakistani state machinery continues to think of innovative ways to fund terrorism, and use its strategic assets in the form of jihadi terror groups to subvert India’s interests at every turn. We must be watchful of developments in Afghanistan as that country has great strategic significance for us. Islamabad will try its utmost best to use the Taliban against India.
But most important, we must guard ourselves against Pakistan’s dirty tricks to diplomatically corner us. We cannot let another Sharm el-Sheikh take place.
2. My Take:
Kafirs ( Non-Moslem Infidels ) of the world have suffered more from Islam, than from any other calamity on earth. Hazrat Mohammad has divided humanity into two classes: Moslems & Non-Moslem Infidels ( Kafirs ). According to Mohammad's categorization, Moslems are the superior people and the rulers & Kafirs ( the inferior people ) are to be ruled by Moslems, through the yoke of Islam. Mohammad has raised the status of Moslems sky-high, because of what he calls the fundamental superiority of Islam. To the Moslems,Mohammad's categorization looks marvellous & mystifying, because it runs down the others, the Kafirs, and because they ( the Moslems ) would be rewarded in Janat ( Moslem's Paradise ), according to this categorization, by Allah & by Mohammad.
3. The superiority of Moslem, of his Islam, the rewards of Janat ( Moslem's Paradise ), and the intercessionary powers of the Prophet, promised by Islam, are illusory, delusive, and psychologically paralysing, to the Moslem as well as to the Kafirs. But the belief in them takes hold, and succeeds in brainwashing the Moslems, who go out to destroy the great nations & cultures of the Non-Moslem world, making Islam a barbaric cult of gigantic proportions. But an average Moslem is not terribly concerned with adherence to truth about Islam. He diligently believes the propaganda fed to him by Mullahs & Maulvies that, Islam is a religion of peace, love, and brotherhood.
4. But the Islamic love of mankind is a hypocrisy & myth, of even greater proportions. Kafir-Hatred ( hatred of Non-Moslems ) is at the very heart of Islam, and has been the biggest pillar of Islam's existence, from day one of Islam. Islam blatantly declares that Kafirs are denizens of Hell, and seeks to ignite a permanent war, between the Moslems & the Non-Moslems. The teachings of Islam have sparked a sense of Islamic superiority among Moslems, and set them on course to, bruise, batter, and brutalize Kafir nations of the world, to convert them to Islam.
5. Moslem has been brainwashed through the teachings of Islam, that salvation is not possible unless people follow the prophet of Islam, who is Allah's messenger. It was Allah who made the laws, who revealed these to Mohammad & gave him instructions regarding government & morality. It is Islamic principle that government belongs to Allah, and must be conducted according to His laws. This is the cornerstone of a Moslem's actions.
6. Note The Islamic teachings, attributes, and methods are Not even remotely similar to the tolerant, secular, and democratic culture of India. Islamic culture is the very anti-thesis of everything that India stands for. Moslems are firmly committed to Islam, and have no recourse other than to overthrow all governments that, do not rest on pure Islamic principles, and hence are corrupt. It is, therefore, the job of a Moslem to tear down the traitorous, rotten, and unjust culture of the Kafirs. This is the duty of every Moslem in the world. Moslems have no alternative but to engage in an armed holy war against the profane Kafir governments of the world.
7. With these kinds of fundamental beliefs of Moslems, who constitue the majority of people that inhabit Pakistan, how can there be ever any friendship between Pakistan & India ?
Surinder Paul Attri
Ravinder Raj
Union Home Minister P Chidambaram’s disgust for Pakistan’s hypocritical ways requires supplementation. As one of the surviving member of an ever-diminishing generation with pre-partition experience, I recall those days in 1947 when a few Muslim children below 16 years of age repeatedly raised two slogans during street processions in Lahore: Hans ke liya Pakistan, ab ladh ke lenge Hindustan. I am pretty sure that those boys must have grown up to be important people within the Pakistani establishment. I am sure that they were behind the Kargil infiltrations and had a hand in all the terror attacks in India till date, including the 26/11 attacks on Mumbai.
The Indian security apparatus should become more efficient in tackling terrorism. This can be achieved through superior intelligence gathering and prompt remedial measures. Our leadership must follow Chanakya’s doctrine of ‘tit for tat’ in dealing with Pakistan. The Government must become more proactive in cracking down on extremists and their supporters. Simultaneously, it must pursue policies to internationally isolate Pakistan. Also, the Government will do well to win over members of the Muslim community to act as agents of the state to check the spread of the jihadi activities. They could promptly report suspicious events and thereby act as eyes and ears of the Government.
There is no denying that constant vigilance should be our credo. For, our enemy is constantly thinking of ways to ‘bleed us dry with a thousand cuts’. No matter how much it tries to deny it, the Pakistani state machinery continues to think of innovative ways to fund terrorism, and use its strategic assets in the form of jihadi terror groups to subvert India’s interests at every turn. We must be watchful of developments in Afghanistan as that country has great strategic significance for us. Islamabad will try its utmost best to use the Taliban against India.
But most important, we must guard ourselves against Pakistan’s dirty tricks to diplomatically corner us. We cannot let another Sharm el-Sheikh take place.
2. My Take:
Kafirs ( Non-Moslem Infidels ) of the world have suffered more from Islam, than from any other calamity on earth. Hazrat Mohammad has divided humanity into two classes: Moslems & Non-Moslem Infidels ( Kafirs ). According to Mohammad's categorization, Moslems are the superior people and the rulers & Kafirs ( the inferior people ) are to be ruled by Moslems, through the yoke of Islam. Mohammad has raised the status of Moslems sky-high, because of what he calls the fundamental superiority of Islam. To the Moslems,Mohammad's categorization looks marvellous & mystifying, because it runs down the others, the Kafirs, and because they ( the Moslems ) would be rewarded in Janat ( Moslem's Paradise ), according to this categorization, by Allah & by Mohammad.
3. The superiority of Moslem, of his Islam, the rewards of Janat ( Moslem's Paradise ), and the intercessionary powers of the Prophet, promised by Islam, are illusory, delusive, and psychologically paralysing, to the Moslem as well as to the Kafirs. But the belief in them takes hold, and succeeds in brainwashing the Moslems, who go out to destroy the great nations & cultures of the Non-Moslem world, making Islam a barbaric cult of gigantic proportions. But an average Moslem is not terribly concerned with adherence to truth about Islam. He diligently believes the propaganda fed to him by Mullahs & Maulvies that, Islam is a religion of peace, love, and brotherhood.
4. But the Islamic love of mankind is a hypocrisy & myth, of even greater proportions. Kafir-Hatred ( hatred of Non-Moslems ) is at the very heart of Islam, and has been the biggest pillar of Islam's existence, from day one of Islam. Islam blatantly declares that Kafirs are denizens of Hell, and seeks to ignite a permanent war, between the Moslems & the Non-Moslems. The teachings of Islam have sparked a sense of Islamic superiority among Moslems, and set them on course to, bruise, batter, and brutalize Kafir nations of the world, to convert them to Islam.
5. Moslem has been brainwashed through the teachings of Islam, that salvation is not possible unless people follow the prophet of Islam, who is Allah's messenger. It was Allah who made the laws, who revealed these to Mohammad & gave him instructions regarding government & morality. It is Islamic principle that government belongs to Allah, and must be conducted according to His laws. This is the cornerstone of a Moslem's actions.
6. Note The Islamic teachings, attributes, and methods are Not even remotely similar to the tolerant, secular, and democratic culture of India. Islamic culture is the very anti-thesis of everything that India stands for. Moslems are firmly committed to Islam, and have no recourse other than to overthrow all governments that, do not rest on pure Islamic principles, and hence are corrupt. It is, therefore, the job of a Moslem to tear down the traitorous, rotten, and unjust culture of the Kafirs. This is the duty of every Moslem in the world. Moslems have no alternative but to engage in an armed holy war against the profane Kafir governments of the world.
7. With these kinds of fundamental beliefs of Moslems, who constitue the majority of people that inhabit Pakistan, how can there be ever any friendship between Pakistan & India ?
Surinder Paul Attri
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Muslims need to introspect
1. Muslims need to introspect
Balbir K Punj
The beheading of two Sikh hostages by the Pakistani Taliban who, it is said, still hold three more Sikhs captive, represents a problem not just for India but for the entire civilised world. Meanwhile, Pakistan is in no mood to take responsibility for the crime and go after the perpetrators as it continues to maintain that the beheadings were carried out by those outside the Pakistani state apparatus. It is appalling that secular apologists and peaceniks in India as well as the Muslim leadership here are silent on this brutality.
According to reports, the brutal beheadings followed the refusal of the Sikh victims to accept the religion of their captors in lieu of failing to pay a religious tax or jizya. If this is true, then there is great urgency for the leaders of Islam to clarify their stand on non-Muslims.
The Constitution as well as the political practices in Pakistan and several other Muslim-majority countries treat non-Muslims as second-class citizens. The top political, civil and Army positions in these countries are reserved only for people belonging to the majority religion. Pakistan’s military dictatorships have built into the state system a close relationship between religion and policy-making. The bulk of the growing teenagers are exposed to a system of education — both in the madarsas and state run-institutions — wherein children are brainwashed to treat all religions except Islam as false and are told that it is perfectly normal to use violence to squeeze the minority out of their religious belief.
It was during the military dictatorship of Gen Zia-ul-Haq that the education and legal systems of Pakistan were totally Islamised. Even a full decade of civilian rule after that could not change the circumstances. Can the apologists in our country deny the fact that the Taliban who carry out brutal beheadings of those belonging to faiths other than Islam are the end products of a regime that legally prescribes death for the lightest slip of the tongue against any doctrine of the majority religion? Can they also deny that the very existence of such a state across the border is deeply influencing the Muslim orthodoxy here? Are we wrong in assuming that those young Muslims from this country who are sucked into joining the Pakistani Taliban and their ilk are motivated by the very same concepts that are hammered into them from childhood through madarsaeducation?
Political parties and leaders who talk of enacting laws to enable Islamic banking and Islamic personal laws, even though they do nothing to ensure gender quality enshrined in our Constitution, should examine whether their vote-bank politics is fuelling these separatist, Talibanistic attitudes among the Muslim population in this country.
Repeated exaggeration of past communal riots force the Muslim minority community to believe that the Indian state is against them when the fact is that the Muslim population in India has grown to over 15 crores from the time of partition while the religious minorities in Pakistan have shrunk to a mere marginal existence.
It would be suicidal for us to refuse to see the armed orthodoxy in Pakistan as different from the Pakistani state. The establishment in Islamabad often cites the fact that Pakistan is also a victim of terror attacks in order to earn the leniency of the international community. Yet it fails to come to terms with the growth of multiple armed Islamist groups or its hydra-headed consequences. Nor is Islamabad eager to take up the issue of cross-border terrorism emanating from its soil in discussions with New Delhi as is now evident from the recently-concluded Foreign Secretary-level talks between the two countries.
And this is Pakistan’s position not just with India; in talks with the Americans, Pakistan’s Army chief refused to re-start operations against the Taliban, let alone crack down on the safe heavens that the jihadis have made for themselves on the Pakistani side of the Durand Line. More dangerous for India is the other fact that the Army continues to be the real seat of power in Pakistan. Its use of the Islamic religious orthodoxy and jihadi terrorist groups against India is well documented. It would never agree to give up these strategic assets.
Pakistan’s real masters also derive strength from the fact that they have the support of other Islamic nations for using state power to sabotage the secular growth in countries that are not yet Islamic or sufficiently Islamic. The act of beheading is still part of the state power that many of these Islamic nations use to punish those considered to be deviants, who have strayed from the laws laid down by the holy books of Islam even by a centimetre. We regularly get reports from Saudi Arabia, Iran and other Islamic nations of publicly-conducted beheadings and incidents of stoning unto death as well as punishments that involve the amputation of the offender’s limbs — acts that all civilised countries throughout the world have long abolished.
The treatment meted out to the Pandits of the Kashmir Valley and the corresponding silence of the Muslim leadership on this injustice have not enabled the Muslim community to convince their Hindu neighbours that true secularism is inherent in the Islamic political doctrine. It is not only the condemnation of the beheadings of Sikhs in Pakistan that the international community is looking forward to. It is the total disavowal of the culture of violence that the civilised world would like to see emerge from the Muslim world. For this there needs to be a renaissance within the global Islamic community. There needs to be introspection and re-evaluation of Islamic values. Unless and until this happens, peace will remain elusive as the virus of jihad will continue to spread far and wide.
2. My Take:
It is not at all surprising that Paki-Talibans, went for the heads of three Kafir-Sikhs. It is not the first time that, such a thing has happened to a Kafir. Let us get down to the nuts & bolts of Islam. Islam. Islam teaches that Moslems must fight Kafirs ( Non-Moslem Infidels ), Sikhs included. Islam states explicitly that Kafirs must be killed unless they, either convert to Islam or submit before the Islamic sword, and live as Zimmies, to acknowledge their inferiority & humiliation, through payment of Jaziyah. This approach appears grotesque & kooky to us Kafirs, but to a Moslem it becomes almost the joy of living. This ceremony of murder ( Kafir-Murder ), which Islam calls Jehad, is the fight in the way of Allah. A Moslem does not notice anything strange about this colossal-crime, because he is only eliminating the mortal enemies ( the hateful-Kafirs ) of Allah.
3. Jehad becomes obligatory on a Moslem, when Kafirs do not practice what Allah & Mohammad have prescribed as the proper way of life. From that point on, a Moslem has no sympathy for the Kafir, he expects only the worst for the Kafir, and makes the worst of things that should happen to a Kafir. And Jehad is all about massacre, Kafir-Massacre.
4. Jehad is also directly connected with Janat ( Moslem's Paradise ). A Moslem goes directly to Janat ( as a reward for engaging in Jehad ) where the Moslem gets the choicest-sex. Allah wouldn't dare refuse Janat-Entry to a Jehadi-Moslem. There is a binding contract between Allah & Moslems. Allah is bound by his Promise to offer Janat to a Moslem, provided he willingly kills & gets killed for Allah's pleasure. This promise is something very fundamental in Islam.
5. Because the three Sikhs described above, neither accepted Islam, nor did they agree to live as Zimmies by payment of Jaziyah, they ran out of the list of choices ( only two choices ), allowed to them by Islam. They are the casualty of Islam's Jehad, it is just that simple.
6. Yes, Moslems need to introspect, but Hindus also need to do some soul-searching. Are we Hindus going to play our centuries-old sucker game, of taking sh** from the Moslems, or devise some anti-jehad countermeasure, and kill the rattle-snake of Islam ?
7. Isn't it time for us Hindus, to use the Tit-For-Tat technique ?
Surinder Paul Attri
Balbir K Punj
The beheading of two Sikh hostages by the Pakistani Taliban who, it is said, still hold three more Sikhs captive, represents a problem not just for India but for the entire civilised world. Meanwhile, Pakistan is in no mood to take responsibility for the crime and go after the perpetrators as it continues to maintain that the beheadings were carried out by those outside the Pakistani state apparatus. It is appalling that secular apologists and peaceniks in India as well as the Muslim leadership here are silent on this brutality.
According to reports, the brutal beheadings followed the refusal of the Sikh victims to accept the religion of their captors in lieu of failing to pay a religious tax or jizya. If this is true, then there is great urgency for the leaders of Islam to clarify their stand on non-Muslims.
The Constitution as well as the political practices in Pakistan and several other Muslim-majority countries treat non-Muslims as second-class citizens. The top political, civil and Army positions in these countries are reserved only for people belonging to the majority religion. Pakistan’s military dictatorships have built into the state system a close relationship between religion and policy-making. The bulk of the growing teenagers are exposed to a system of education — both in the madarsas and state run-institutions — wherein children are brainwashed to treat all religions except Islam as false and are told that it is perfectly normal to use violence to squeeze the minority out of their religious belief.
It was during the military dictatorship of Gen Zia-ul-Haq that the education and legal systems of Pakistan were totally Islamised. Even a full decade of civilian rule after that could not change the circumstances. Can the apologists in our country deny the fact that the Taliban who carry out brutal beheadings of those belonging to faiths other than Islam are the end products of a regime that legally prescribes death for the lightest slip of the tongue against any doctrine of the majority religion? Can they also deny that the very existence of such a state across the border is deeply influencing the Muslim orthodoxy here? Are we wrong in assuming that those young Muslims from this country who are sucked into joining the Pakistani Taliban and their ilk are motivated by the very same concepts that are hammered into them from childhood through madarsaeducation?
Political parties and leaders who talk of enacting laws to enable Islamic banking and Islamic personal laws, even though they do nothing to ensure gender quality enshrined in our Constitution, should examine whether their vote-bank politics is fuelling these separatist, Talibanistic attitudes among the Muslim population in this country.
Repeated exaggeration of past communal riots force the Muslim minority community to believe that the Indian state is against them when the fact is that the Muslim population in India has grown to over 15 crores from the time of partition while the religious minorities in Pakistan have shrunk to a mere marginal existence.
It would be suicidal for us to refuse to see the armed orthodoxy in Pakistan as different from the Pakistani state. The establishment in Islamabad often cites the fact that Pakistan is also a victim of terror attacks in order to earn the leniency of the international community. Yet it fails to come to terms with the growth of multiple armed Islamist groups or its hydra-headed consequences. Nor is Islamabad eager to take up the issue of cross-border terrorism emanating from its soil in discussions with New Delhi as is now evident from the recently-concluded Foreign Secretary-level talks between the two countries.
And this is Pakistan’s position not just with India; in talks with the Americans, Pakistan’s Army chief refused to re-start operations against the Taliban, let alone crack down on the safe heavens that the jihadis have made for themselves on the Pakistani side of the Durand Line. More dangerous for India is the other fact that the Army continues to be the real seat of power in Pakistan. Its use of the Islamic religious orthodoxy and jihadi terrorist groups against India is well documented. It would never agree to give up these strategic assets.
Pakistan’s real masters also derive strength from the fact that they have the support of other Islamic nations for using state power to sabotage the secular growth in countries that are not yet Islamic or sufficiently Islamic. The act of beheading is still part of the state power that many of these Islamic nations use to punish those considered to be deviants, who have strayed from the laws laid down by the holy books of Islam even by a centimetre. We regularly get reports from Saudi Arabia, Iran and other Islamic nations of publicly-conducted beheadings and incidents of stoning unto death as well as punishments that involve the amputation of the offender’s limbs — acts that all civilised countries throughout the world have long abolished.
The treatment meted out to the Pandits of the Kashmir Valley and the corresponding silence of the Muslim leadership on this injustice have not enabled the Muslim community to convince their Hindu neighbours that true secularism is inherent in the Islamic political doctrine. It is not only the condemnation of the beheadings of Sikhs in Pakistan that the international community is looking forward to. It is the total disavowal of the culture of violence that the civilised world would like to see emerge from the Muslim world. For this there needs to be a renaissance within the global Islamic community. There needs to be introspection and re-evaluation of Islamic values. Unless and until this happens, peace will remain elusive as the virus of jihad will continue to spread far and wide.
2. My Take:
It is not at all surprising that Paki-Talibans, went for the heads of three Kafir-Sikhs. It is not the first time that, such a thing has happened to a Kafir. Let us get down to the nuts & bolts of Islam. Islam. Islam teaches that Moslems must fight Kafirs ( Non-Moslem Infidels ), Sikhs included. Islam states explicitly that Kafirs must be killed unless they, either convert to Islam or submit before the Islamic sword, and live as Zimmies, to acknowledge their inferiority & humiliation, through payment of Jaziyah. This approach appears grotesque & kooky to us Kafirs, but to a Moslem it becomes almost the joy of living. This ceremony of murder ( Kafir-Murder ), which Islam calls Jehad, is the fight in the way of Allah. A Moslem does not notice anything strange about this colossal-crime, because he is only eliminating the mortal enemies ( the hateful-Kafirs ) of Allah.
3. Jehad becomes obligatory on a Moslem, when Kafirs do not practice what Allah & Mohammad have prescribed as the proper way of life. From that point on, a Moslem has no sympathy for the Kafir, he expects only the worst for the Kafir, and makes the worst of things that should happen to a Kafir. And Jehad is all about massacre, Kafir-Massacre.
4. Jehad is also directly connected with Janat ( Moslem's Paradise ). A Moslem goes directly to Janat ( as a reward for engaging in Jehad ) where the Moslem gets the choicest-sex. Allah wouldn't dare refuse Janat-Entry to a Jehadi-Moslem. There is a binding contract between Allah & Moslems. Allah is bound by his Promise to offer Janat to a Moslem, provided he willingly kills & gets killed for Allah's pleasure. This promise is something very fundamental in Islam.
5. Because the three Sikhs described above, neither accepted Islam, nor did they agree to live as Zimmies by payment of Jaziyah, they ran out of the list of choices ( only two choices ), allowed to them by Islam. They are the casualty of Islam's Jehad, it is just that simple.
6. Yes, Moslems need to introspect, but Hindus also need to do some soul-searching. Are we Hindus going to play our centuries-old sucker game, of taking sh** from the Moslems, or devise some anti-jehad countermeasure, and kill the rattle-snake of Islam ?
7. Isn't it time for us Hindus, to use the Tit-For-Tat technique ?
Surinder Paul Attri
VANGUARDS OF ISLAM
Subj: VANGUARDS OF ISLAM
1. Bhai Sahib
It is disheartening that Shashi Tharoor is at it again.
Now this idiot says that Saudi Arabia should muddle into Indo-Pak
talks.
How disgusting, in fact this is what Pakistan is crying hoarse
by beating its breasts in open foras.
Tharoor is the product of the education system introduced
by Maulana Azad and his ilks.
We don't seem to have any self-respect!
BK Chaudhari
2. My Take:
Shashi Tharoor is a great example of Phoney-Liberalism. He is a real phoney, atom by atom, and with molecular precision. His Phoney-Liberalism is sickening.
3. Shashi Tharoor needs to be informed, not only about the Imperialist, Political Ideology of Islam, but also about Islamic havoc in India.
Surinder Paul Attri
1. Bhai Sahib
It is disheartening that Shashi Tharoor is at it again.
Now this idiot says that Saudi Arabia should muddle into Indo-Pak
talks.
How disgusting, in fact this is what Pakistan is crying hoarse
by beating its breasts in open foras.
Tharoor is the product of the education system introduced
by Maulana Azad and his ilks.
We don't seem to have any self-respect!
BK Chaudhari
2. My Take:
Shashi Tharoor is a great example of Phoney-Liberalism. He is a real phoney, atom by atom, and with molecular precision. His Phoney-Liberalism is sickening.
3. Shashi Tharoor needs to be informed, not only about the Imperialist, Political Ideology of Islam, but also about Islamic havoc in India.
Surinder Paul Attri
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)