Subj: Islam's special kindness to women
Women in Islam, live under an arch of barbarity. They are at the mercy of Moslem men. In Islam, women are mere objects of sexual desire, to satisfy the sexual appetite of Moslem men, in the name of Allah. Moslem clergy, tries to justify the perverted actions of Islam. Hazrat Mohammad justified these actions, by suddenly getting a revelation from Allah, declaring the action to be right.
Hazrat Mohammad's appetite for sex, his hunger for lascivious ladies, his lecherous behavior towards his wives, concubines, and slaves, formed the model for all Moslems to follow. Hazrat Mohammad was declared the most perfect man, and all Moslem men are to follow him.
The great Mohammad, the founder of Islam, constructed the arch of barbarity for Moslem women.
Islam is heck of a religion ( ideology ).
Surinder Paul Attri
Friday, April 23, 2010
Sunday, April 11, 2010
Slaughter of 500 Kafir-Christians of Nigeria
Subj: Slaughter of 500 Kafir-Christians of Nigeria
1. Beth Galilnsky of the Jewish Action Alliance organized a protest by 50
local organizations at U.N. in New York against the recent massacre of 500
Nigerian Christians by Radical Islamists in Nigeria.
Since Indian American Intellectuals Forum is actively engaged in creating
an awareness about the menace of Islamic terrorism all over the world,
President of Indian American Intellectuals Forum Narain Kataria, Vice President
Arish Sahani and Satya Dosapati of Hindu Human Rights Watch were invited
to join the protest and address the Rally.
Narain Kataria
Prsident, Indian American Intellectuals Forum
Director, Hindu Human Rights Watch
Founder Member Human Rights Coalition Against Radical Islam
41-67 Judge St. (5P)
Elmhurst, NY 11373
718) 478-5735
2. My Take:
Islam has murdered 500 Christians in Nigeria. It is an act of crime, but in Islam it is not crime at all, it is legal and part of their religion ( Islam), it is part of their Jihad ( Holy-War against the Kafirs/Non-Moslem Infidels ) against Kafir-Christians. The boldness of this barbaric-move stuns Kafirs all over the world. It is a warning to all Kafirs of the world that, Islam is not a religion at all, but is an ideology that is insidious, it is a devilish-disease that is creeping into the veins of the world, under the camouflage slogan of:
" Islam is a religion of peace, love, and brotherhood. "
3. But Islam is nothing of the sort. Islam has sanctified the whole world with, slaughter, brutal terror & torture, rape, and plunder of Kafirs. These actions of barbarity are suported by Quran & Hadiths, and are in the service of Merciful Allah. The distribution of loot, plunder, and booty of Kafir property, which includes Kafir men, women, and children, is well-defined in Quran & Hadiths, and it is all in the service of Merciful Allah.
As long as the Moslems murder, loot, and plunder the Kafirs, it is " Completely " justified, and Moslems are awarded the title of Ghazis ( Honorable Warriors Of Islam ).
4.Such acts of slaughter, loot, rape, and plunder, were regarded as shameful acts, in Pre-Islamic Arabia. But Mohammad passed on false information, and told his followers that, such acts are sanctioned by Allah, and that he is the last prophet of Allah, for all time to come.
5. This pattern of murder of Kafir-Christians of Nigeria, has been followed by Moslems all over the world. Moslems have been ( and are still doing it ) annihilating & brutalizing Kafirs of the world, for 1400 years. Still the Moslems have the gaze & guts to claim that their Islam:
" is a religion of peace, love, and brotherhood. "
6. But there is a difference between what the Moslems claim, and what the truth is.
Surinder Paul Attri
1. Beth Galilnsky of the Jewish Action Alliance organized a protest by 50
local organizations at U.N. in New York against the recent massacre of 500
Nigerian Christians by Radical Islamists in Nigeria.
Since Indian American Intellectuals Forum is actively engaged in creating
an awareness about the menace of Islamic terrorism all over the world,
President of Indian American Intellectuals Forum Narain Kataria, Vice President
Arish Sahani and Satya Dosapati of Hindu Human Rights Watch were invited
to join the protest and address the Rally.
Narain Kataria
Prsident, Indian American Intellectuals Forum
Director, Hindu Human Rights Watch
Founder Member Human Rights Coalition Against Radical Islam
41-67 Judge St. (5P)
Elmhurst, NY 11373
718) 478-5735
2. My Take:
Islam has murdered 500 Christians in Nigeria. It is an act of crime, but in Islam it is not crime at all, it is legal and part of their religion ( Islam), it is part of their Jihad ( Holy-War against the Kafirs/Non-Moslem Infidels ) against Kafir-Christians. The boldness of this barbaric-move stuns Kafirs all over the world. It is a warning to all Kafirs of the world that, Islam is not a religion at all, but is an ideology that is insidious, it is a devilish-disease that is creeping into the veins of the world, under the camouflage slogan of:
" Islam is a religion of peace, love, and brotherhood. "
3. But Islam is nothing of the sort. Islam has sanctified the whole world with, slaughter, brutal terror & torture, rape, and plunder of Kafirs. These actions of barbarity are suported by Quran & Hadiths, and are in the service of Merciful Allah. The distribution of loot, plunder, and booty of Kafir property, which includes Kafir men, women, and children, is well-defined in Quran & Hadiths, and it is all in the service of Merciful Allah.
As long as the Moslems murder, loot, and plunder the Kafirs, it is " Completely " justified, and Moslems are awarded the title of Ghazis ( Honorable Warriors Of Islam ).
4.Such acts of slaughter, loot, rape, and plunder, were regarded as shameful acts, in Pre-Islamic Arabia. But Mohammad passed on false information, and told his followers that, such acts are sanctioned by Allah, and that he is the last prophet of Allah, for all time to come.
5. This pattern of murder of Kafir-Christians of Nigeria, has been followed by Moslems all over the world. Moslems have been ( and are still doing it ) annihilating & brutalizing Kafirs of the world, for 1400 years. Still the Moslems have the gaze & guts to claim that their Islam:
" is a religion of peace, love, and brotherhood. "
6. But there is a difference between what the Moslems claim, and what the truth is.
Surinder Paul Attri
Monday, April 5, 2010
Jesus Christ's return
Subj: Jesus Christ's return
1. mY TAKE ON IT:
hE WOULD NEVER COME BACK...HE KNOWS THAT IT WILL BE DE JA VOU IF HE EVER RETURNS HERE, & HE WOULD BE OUT OF HIS MIND TO GO THRU THE CRUCIFIXION & TORTURE AGAIN.
2. My Take:
Quote: HE KNOWS THAT IT WILL BE DE JA VOU IF HE EVER RETURNS HERE, & HE WOULD BE OUT OF HIS MIND TO GO THRU THE CRUCIFIXION & TORTURE AGAIN.
COMMENT: An imbecile like Jesus Christ wouldn't know his fate and his fateful-doom next time around ( even if he could come back ).
He did not know what the Hell he was doing. He had his head up his A**. He was driving a totally imaginary creature ( the Devil ) out of people, and took credit for his horse-sh**. He was worse than a snake-oil salesman. To expect him to be any smarter next time around, is a very unsafe bet.
He also told his followers that he is coming back,
This is extreme, insulting, and impossible, but an idiot like Jesus Christ, won't know the impossibility of this proceducre. To accomplish this action, would violate some of the basic ( fundamental ) laws of science.
4. In the world of quantum mechanics, however, an individual sufficiently similar could possibility exist, but most likely would not have a terrible sense of past-familiarity ( Deja Vu ), to travel back in time, and repeat a different person's ( Jesus Christ ) actions & stupidities..
5. Millions of Christians passionately think that, Jesus is coming back. It is comforting to them that, he is coming back. But there is a difference between what is comforting & what is true.
Surinder Paul Attri
1. mY TAKE ON IT:
hE WOULD NEVER COME BACK...HE KNOWS THAT IT WILL BE DE JA VOU IF HE EVER RETURNS HERE, & HE WOULD BE OUT OF HIS MIND TO GO THRU THE CRUCIFIXION & TORTURE AGAIN.
2. My Take:
Quote: HE KNOWS THAT IT WILL BE DE JA VOU IF HE EVER RETURNS HERE, & HE WOULD BE OUT OF HIS MIND TO GO THRU THE CRUCIFIXION & TORTURE AGAIN.
COMMENT: An imbecile like Jesus Christ wouldn't know his fate and his fateful-doom next time around ( even if he could come back ).
He did not know what the Hell he was doing. He had his head up his A**. He was driving a totally imaginary creature ( the Devil ) out of people, and took credit for his horse-sh**. He was worse than a snake-oil salesman. To expect him to be any smarter next time around, is a very unsafe bet.
He also told his followers that he is coming back,
This is extreme, insulting, and impossible, but an idiot like Jesus Christ, won't know the impossibility of this proceducre. To accomplish this action, would violate some of the basic ( fundamental ) laws of science.
4. In the world of quantum mechanics, however, an individual sufficiently similar could possibility exist, but most likely would not have a terrible sense of past-familiarity ( Deja Vu ), to travel back in time, and repeat a different person's ( Jesus Christ ) actions & stupidities..
5. Millions of Christians passionately think that, Jesus is coming back. It is comforting to them that, he is coming back. But there is a difference between what is comforting & what is true.
Surinder Paul Attri
Sunday, April 4, 2010
Sexual abuse scandals, in the Catholic church
Subj: Sexual abuse scandals, in the Catholic church
1. A pope with a problem
http://www.christianaggression.org/item_display.php?id=1270190944&type=ARTICLES
Tim Rutten
March 27,2010
Los Angeles Times
By lashing out at the coverage of the sexual abuse scandal, the Roman Catholic Church shows it has learned little from the squalid affair.
This has been a tough Lent for the Roman Catholic Church. Its seemingly endless sexual abuse scandal finally has seeped into the papal apartments, and the Vatican's response to this week's revelations suggests that far too little has been learned from this squalid affair.
Until now, Pope Benedict XVI had seemed to be taking a far more forthright approach to the problem than his predecessor, John Paul II, most recently in a blistering "pastoral letter" to the entire Irish church.
This week, however, the New York Times published a pair of stories suggesting that Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger -- the future Pope Benedict -- participated in precisely the sort of secrecy and administrative negligence that has been at the root of this scandal.
Documents produced over the church's objections in an American lawsuit show that the Vatican's Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which Ratzinger headed from 1981-2005, declined to defrock Father Lawrence C. Murphy, even though he molested at least 200 boys at a Wisconsin school for the deaf. In 1996, then-Milwaukee Archbishop Rembert G. Weakland twice wrote directly to Ratzinger requesting a trial aimed at defrocking Murphy, whose crimes were known to three successive Milwaukee prelates.
Ultimately, Ratzinger's deputy, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, authorized a trial, then halted it after Murphy -- by then aging and in ill health -- wrote to Ratzinger appealing for leniency. As pope, Benedict has appointed Bertone to the Vatican's two highest offices, secretary of State and Camerlengo. The last Italian cardinal to hold both posts simultaneously was Eugenio Pacelli, the future Pope Pius XII.
On Friday, the New York Times reported that, as archbishop of Munich, Ratzinger presided over a meeting that approved the return to parish work of an admitted pedophile, who went on to molest more children. A memo from that period also seems to show that the cardinal was "kept informed about the priest's assignment."
The Holy See's reaction to both stories has been swift. An unsigned editorial this week in the Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano attacked the New York Times by name, accusing the paper of willfully ignoring the "truth" of Ratzinger/Benedict's record and of attempting "to instrumentalize, without any foundation in fact, horrible episodes and sorrowful events uncovered in some cases from decades ago." The media, it continued, showed a "despicable intent of attacking, at whatever cost, Benedict XVI and his closest collaborators."
Earlier in the week, New York's archbishop, Timothy Dolan, used his blog to dismiss the New York Times' reports and defend the pontiff's record by arguing that authorities outside the church also are culpable. Stories about sexual abuse by priests were "fair" if "unending," he wrote. But he condemned the media for portraying child sexual abuse "as a tragedy unique to the church alone. That, of course, is malarkey."
Sadly, this latest everybody-is-responsible-so-nobody-is-to-blame defense is of a piece with a little-noticed section of Benedict's letter to the Irish church in which he seemed to blame the crisis, in part, on "new and serious challenges to the faith arising from the rapid transformation and secularization of Irish society."
So what happens now?
In all likelihood, nothing. Even if further revelations show that Benedict was malfeasantly negligent as a cardinal, there is no canonical mechanism that could force him to step down. The last pope to resign was Gregory XII in 1415, and he acted to heal a schism that had produced three claimants to the Throne of Peter.
What now seems likely is that the pontiff, who turns 83 next month, will spend the rest of his papacy dealing with the fallout of an ever-widening scandal. His situation will be precisely the one over which he assailed the Irish bishops in his recent letter: "It cannot be denied that some of you and your predecessors failed, at times grievously, to apply the long-established norms of canon law to the crime of child abuse. . . . I recognize how difficult it was to grasp the extent and complexity of the problem, to obtain reliable information and to make the right decisions in the light of conflicting expert advice. Nevertheless, it must be admitted that grave errors of judgment were made and failures of leadership occurred. All this has seriously undermined your credibility and effectiveness."
2. My Take:
Vatican's efforts to keep its sexual abuse scandal out of sight, is being frustrated by the media. The more Vatican tries concealment, the worse it gets.
The Catholic sex abuse cases, are a series of lawsuits, crimimal prosecutions, and scandals relating to sexual abuse committed by Catholic priests. It also includes the behavior of some members of the Catholic hierarchy, who did not report to civil authorities, and in many cases re-assigned the offenders to other locations, where they continued to have contact with minors, giving them the opportunity to continue their sexual abuse. Prevailing psychology of the Catholic church is that, people could be cured of such behavior through counseling.
3. NOTE: Sexual-Scandal is Not new for Catholic church. It has had a long residence inside the Catholic church.There has always been, plenty of sex behind church walls. Church priests have not been exemplifications of nobleness of mind, but archetypes of sham religious service, behind a facade of piety.
4. What about the Popes ?
Popes are Not immune, to the temptations of the flesh !
A number of Popes have sired bastard children. Some of the bastard children, made Popes themselves.
5. This scandal highlights the deep-seated problems, that exist with mandatory celibacy in the priesthood of Catholic church, and how that institution deals with, allegations of child abuse by its clergy.
Surinder Paul Attri
1. A pope with a problem
http://www.christianaggression.org/item_display.php?id=1270190944&type=ARTICLES
Tim Rutten
March 27,2010
Los Angeles Times
By lashing out at the coverage of the sexual abuse scandal, the Roman Catholic Church shows it has learned little from the squalid affair.
This has been a tough Lent for the Roman Catholic Church. Its seemingly endless sexual abuse scandal finally has seeped into the papal apartments, and the Vatican's response to this week's revelations suggests that far too little has been learned from this squalid affair.
Until now, Pope Benedict XVI had seemed to be taking a far more forthright approach to the problem than his predecessor, John Paul II, most recently in a blistering "pastoral letter" to the entire Irish church.
This week, however, the New York Times published a pair of stories suggesting that Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger -- the future Pope Benedict -- participated in precisely the sort of secrecy and administrative negligence that has been at the root of this scandal.
Documents produced over the church's objections in an American lawsuit show that the Vatican's Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which Ratzinger headed from 1981-2005, declined to defrock Father Lawrence C. Murphy, even though he molested at least 200 boys at a Wisconsin school for the deaf. In 1996, then-Milwaukee Archbishop Rembert G. Weakland twice wrote directly to Ratzinger requesting a trial aimed at defrocking Murphy, whose crimes were known to three successive Milwaukee prelates.
Ultimately, Ratzinger's deputy, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, authorized a trial, then halted it after Murphy -- by then aging and in ill health -- wrote to Ratzinger appealing for leniency. As pope, Benedict has appointed Bertone to the Vatican's two highest offices, secretary of State and Camerlengo. The last Italian cardinal to hold both posts simultaneously was Eugenio Pacelli, the future Pope Pius XII.
On Friday, the New York Times reported that, as archbishop of Munich, Ratzinger presided over a meeting that approved the return to parish work of an admitted pedophile, who went on to molest more children. A memo from that period also seems to show that the cardinal was "kept informed about the priest's assignment."
The Holy See's reaction to both stories has been swift. An unsigned editorial this week in the Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano attacked the New York Times by name, accusing the paper of willfully ignoring the "truth" of Ratzinger/Benedict's record and of attempting "to instrumentalize, without any foundation in fact, horrible episodes and sorrowful events uncovered in some cases from decades ago." The media, it continued, showed a "despicable intent of attacking, at whatever cost, Benedict XVI and his closest collaborators."
Earlier in the week, New York's archbishop, Timothy Dolan, used his blog to dismiss the New York Times' reports and defend the pontiff's record by arguing that authorities outside the church also are culpable. Stories about sexual abuse by priests were "fair" if "unending," he wrote. But he condemned the media for portraying child sexual abuse "as a tragedy unique to the church alone. That, of course, is malarkey."
Sadly, this latest everybody-is-responsible-so-nobody-is-to-blame defense is of a piece with a little-noticed section of Benedict's letter to the Irish church in which he seemed to blame the crisis, in part, on "new and serious challenges to the faith arising from the rapid transformation and secularization of Irish society."
So what happens now?
In all likelihood, nothing. Even if further revelations show that Benedict was malfeasantly negligent as a cardinal, there is no canonical mechanism that could force him to step down. The last pope to resign was Gregory XII in 1415, and he acted to heal a schism that had produced three claimants to the Throne of Peter.
What now seems likely is that the pontiff, who turns 83 next month, will spend the rest of his papacy dealing with the fallout of an ever-widening scandal. His situation will be precisely the one over which he assailed the Irish bishops in his recent letter: "It cannot be denied that some of you and your predecessors failed, at times grievously, to apply the long-established norms of canon law to the crime of child abuse. . . . I recognize how difficult it was to grasp the extent and complexity of the problem, to obtain reliable information and to make the right decisions in the light of conflicting expert advice. Nevertheless, it must be admitted that grave errors of judgment were made and failures of leadership occurred. All this has seriously undermined your credibility and effectiveness."
2. My Take:
Vatican's efforts to keep its sexual abuse scandal out of sight, is being frustrated by the media. The more Vatican tries concealment, the worse it gets.
The Catholic sex abuse cases, are a series of lawsuits, crimimal prosecutions, and scandals relating to sexual abuse committed by Catholic priests. It also includes the behavior of some members of the Catholic hierarchy, who did not report to civil authorities, and in many cases re-assigned the offenders to other locations, where they continued to have contact with minors, giving them the opportunity to continue their sexual abuse. Prevailing psychology of the Catholic church is that, people could be cured of such behavior through counseling.
3. NOTE: Sexual-Scandal is Not new for Catholic church. It has had a long residence inside the Catholic church.There has always been, plenty of sex behind church walls. Church priests have not been exemplifications of nobleness of mind, but archetypes of sham religious service, behind a facade of piety.
4. What about the Popes ?
Popes are Not immune, to the temptations of the flesh !
A number of Popes have sired bastard children. Some of the bastard children, made Popes themselves.
5. This scandal highlights the deep-seated problems, that exist with mandatory celibacy in the priesthood of Catholic church, and how that institution deals with, allegations of child abuse by its clergy.
Surinder Paul Attri
Saturday, April 3, 2010
The Jesus Question Jesus — Will He Ever Return?
1. Subj: The Jesus Question
Jesus — Will He Ever Return?
2. My Take:
This is an Easy question to answer ( Don't make it any more difficult than what it is ! )
3. Jesus Christ did Not level with his followers. He told them that he is coming back. But he is Not coming back. He CANNOT come back, any more than Harry Houdini can.
NOTE: Harry Houdini also told his audience that he is coming back.
Surinder Paul Attri
Jesus — Will He Ever Return?
2. My Take:
This is an Easy question to answer ( Don't make it any more difficult than what it is ! )
3. Jesus Christ did Not level with his followers. He told them that he is coming back. But he is Not coming back. He CANNOT come back, any more than Harry Houdini can.
NOTE: Harry Houdini also told his audience that he is coming back.
Surinder Paul Attri
Friday, April 2, 2010
JIHAD, THE MILITARY TOOL OF ISLAM
Subj: JIHAD, THE MILITARY TOOL OF ISLAM
1. bhagavaandaas tyaagi
to me
show details 8:13 PM (22 hours ago)
surinder attri jii ! VERY TRUE AND VERY WELL SAID ! ----
[[[ IT SHOULD BE surendr instead of surinder ]]] ,
[[[ सुरेन्द्र = SURENDR ; सुरिंदर = SURINDAR ; सुरेंदर SURENDAR ; surinder = सुरिन्देर ]]]
2. My Take:
Shri Tyaagi Jee:
Thanks for approval.
3. Quote: IT SHOULD BE surendr instead of surinder ]]]
COMMENT: There are several ways of spelling my name, all equally valid. This particular version of " surendr " gives me a funny feeling, because it looks like & sounds like " surrender ( to lay down arms, to throw in the towel ).
4. For whatever it is worth:
I do not consider myself a COWARD-HOWARD. I gauge myself as a:
a Proud-Kafir
b. Proud-Pagan
c. Proud-Heathen.
Surinder Paul Attri
1. bhagavaandaas tyaagi
to me
show details 8:13 PM (22 hours ago)
surinder attri jii ! VERY TRUE AND VERY WELL SAID ! ----
[[[ IT SHOULD BE surendr instead of surinder ]]] ,
[[[ सुरेन्द्र = SURENDR ; सुरिंदर = SURINDAR ; सुरेंदर SURENDAR ; surinder = सुरिन्देर ]]]
2. My Take:
Shri Tyaagi Jee:
Thanks for approval.
3. Quote: IT SHOULD BE surendr instead of surinder ]]]
COMMENT: There are several ways of spelling my name, all equally valid. This particular version of " surendr " gives me a funny feeling, because it looks like & sounds like " surrender ( to lay down arms, to throw in the towel ).
4. For whatever it is worth:
I do not consider myself a COWARD-HOWARD. I gauge myself as a:
a Proud-Kafir
b. Proud-Pagan
c. Proud-Heathen.
Surinder Paul Attri
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
JIHAD, THE MILITARY TOOL OF ISLAM
JIHAD, THE MILITARY TOOL OF ISLAM
By S.P. Attri ( USA )
----------------------------------------------------------
1. Jihad ( Holy War ) is the religious duty of Moslems, it appears frequently in Quran, and means fighting in Allah's way. From early age, through Quranic education, a Moslem gets taught that Kafirs ( Non-Moslem Infidels ), refuse to obey Allah & acknowledge Mohammad as the last prophet of God ( Allah ). Because Islam does not recognize any God other than Allah any where, it conducts Jihad to eliminatede all Kafirs. Jihadic-Duty is " obligatory " on a Moslems, it is Islam's sixth pillar, and one of ten great Islamic duties.
Question: Is Islamic-Jihad defensive or offensive warfare ?
Neither Quran nor Sunna ( prophet's example ) answers this question. However in Islam, only form of warfare permitted is Jihadic-Warfare.
Still Islamic Clergy denies, that Jihad is war against Kafirs. This is a Lie, and ought to be taken, with a bucket of salt.
2. Quran explicitly states: Because Kafirs do not believe ( in Islam ), they are Infidels, and must be converted, murdered, or enslaved. That is why, Jihad aims at:
a. Extermination of Kufr, by converting Kafirs to Islam
b. Expansion of Islam
3. Excuses of Islamists are in abundance:
Some Islamists apologize for Islam by quoting some Hadiths, which talk about greater-Jihad ( spiritual-Jihad ) and lesser-Jihad ( physical-warfare ). But these Hadiths are considered un-authentic.
Other Islamists excuse Islam, by describing Jihad as struggle ( warfare ), to establish just & moral social order. Because in Islam, the only just & moral social order is Islam, all Kafir systems are on Islam's hit list, to be annihilated.
Hazrat Mohammad himself & his followers after him, conducted massive Jihadic wars, they forced Kafirs to convert to Islam. Because all Islamic-Jihad has been Jihad of the sword, excuses of Islamists do not pan out.
4. Hazrat Mohammad divided world into two groups :
a. Dar-Ul-Islam ( House of Peace: where Islam rules )
b. Dar-Ul-Harb ( House of War: where Kafirs rule )
Hazrat Mohammad proclaimed that, these two groups will war, until entire Dar-Ul-Harb converts to Islam. Jihadi-Moslems will receive rewards of both worlds---treasures in this one, and Janat ( Moslem's Paradise, with lots of Houris ) in the next.
These highly attractive rewards, have enabled Islam to recruit extremely large number of volunteers, ready to kill & get killed in the name of Allah.
5. Quran's specific admonitions to Moslems are:
a Fight in the name of Allah
b. Fight in the way of Allah
c. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah
d. Make it a Holy War
e Fight those who hold not-forbidden, which has been forbidden by Allah, and by the Messenger
f. Fight those who acknowledge not the religion of truth ( Islam )
g. Fight Kafirs, until they pay Jaziya with submission, and feel themselves subdued.
h. In war, a Moslem either becomes a Ghazi ( Soldier of Islam ) if he wins, or a Shaheed ( Martyr of Islam ) if he loses
6. To put it simply:
Jihad is all about murdering & mutilating Kafirs, and there is a Direct connection between Kafir murder and, provision of choicest after-death sex in Janat ( Moslem's Paradise ), in the most pleasurable settings. Jihad is guaranteed by Allah & Allah is honor-bound to offer Janat, as a gift to a Moslem. Since Jihad is a sure gateway to Janat, it is extremely popular amongst Moslems. It is supported by both Quran & Hadiths:
According to a Hadith in Sahih Al-Bukhari:
Jihad is the third best deed for a Moslem, after offering prayers at stated times, and being dutiful to parents.
Another Hadith in Sahih Al-Bukhari states:
Jihad is the second best deed for a Moslem, after belief in Allah & Mohammad
Another Hadith says:
No deed equals Jihad in reward, and that Mujahid ( a Moslem who does Jihad ) is rewarded even for the footsteps of his horse, while it wanders about.
7. Jihad has been prescribed for Moslems, by Mohammad and Allah, and not by Allah alone.
From Day One of its existence, Islam has been a Military-Ideology, and Kafirs have been on its SH**-List. It still is " An Implacable Foe Of The Kafirs. " Spirituality is non-existent in Islam & Islam does not qualify as a religion. But its Jihad is " Top Of The Line Barbarism. "
Surinder Paul Attri
By S.P. Attri ( USA )
----------------------------------------------------------
1. Jihad ( Holy War ) is the religious duty of Moslems, it appears frequently in Quran, and means fighting in Allah's way. From early age, through Quranic education, a Moslem gets taught that Kafirs ( Non-Moslem Infidels ), refuse to obey Allah & acknowledge Mohammad as the last prophet of God ( Allah ). Because Islam does not recognize any God other than Allah any where, it conducts Jihad to eliminatede all Kafirs. Jihadic-Duty is " obligatory " on a Moslems, it is Islam's sixth pillar, and one of ten great Islamic duties.
Question: Is Islamic-Jihad defensive or offensive warfare ?
Neither Quran nor Sunna ( prophet's example ) answers this question. However in Islam, only form of warfare permitted is Jihadic-Warfare.
Still Islamic Clergy denies, that Jihad is war against Kafirs. This is a Lie, and ought to be taken, with a bucket of salt.
2. Quran explicitly states: Because Kafirs do not believe ( in Islam ), they are Infidels, and must be converted, murdered, or enslaved. That is why, Jihad aims at:
a. Extermination of Kufr, by converting Kafirs to Islam
b. Expansion of Islam
3. Excuses of Islamists are in abundance:
Some Islamists apologize for Islam by quoting some Hadiths, which talk about greater-Jihad ( spiritual-Jihad ) and lesser-Jihad ( physical-warfare ). But these Hadiths are considered un-authentic.
Other Islamists excuse Islam, by describing Jihad as struggle ( warfare ), to establish just & moral social order. Because in Islam, the only just & moral social order is Islam, all Kafir systems are on Islam's hit list, to be annihilated.
Hazrat Mohammad himself & his followers after him, conducted massive Jihadic wars, they forced Kafirs to convert to Islam. Because all Islamic-Jihad has been Jihad of the sword, excuses of Islamists do not pan out.
4. Hazrat Mohammad divided world into two groups :
a. Dar-Ul-Islam ( House of Peace: where Islam rules )
b. Dar-Ul-Harb ( House of War: where Kafirs rule )
Hazrat Mohammad proclaimed that, these two groups will war, until entire Dar-Ul-Harb converts to Islam. Jihadi-Moslems will receive rewards of both worlds---treasures in this one, and Janat ( Moslem's Paradise, with lots of Houris ) in the next.
These highly attractive rewards, have enabled Islam to recruit extremely large number of volunteers, ready to kill & get killed in the name of Allah.
5. Quran's specific admonitions to Moslems are:
a Fight in the name of Allah
b. Fight in the way of Allah
c. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah
d. Make it a Holy War
e Fight those who hold not-forbidden, which has been forbidden by Allah, and by the Messenger
f. Fight those who acknowledge not the religion of truth ( Islam )
g. Fight Kafirs, until they pay Jaziya with submission, and feel themselves subdued.
h. In war, a Moslem either becomes a Ghazi ( Soldier of Islam ) if he wins, or a Shaheed ( Martyr of Islam ) if he loses
6. To put it simply:
Jihad is all about murdering & mutilating Kafirs, and there is a Direct connection between Kafir murder and, provision of choicest after-death sex in Janat ( Moslem's Paradise ), in the most pleasurable settings. Jihad is guaranteed by Allah & Allah is honor-bound to offer Janat, as a gift to a Moslem. Since Jihad is a sure gateway to Janat, it is extremely popular amongst Moslems. It is supported by both Quran & Hadiths:
According to a Hadith in Sahih Al-Bukhari:
Jihad is the third best deed for a Moslem, after offering prayers at stated times, and being dutiful to parents.
Another Hadith in Sahih Al-Bukhari states:
Jihad is the second best deed for a Moslem, after belief in Allah & Mohammad
Another Hadith says:
No deed equals Jihad in reward, and that Mujahid ( a Moslem who does Jihad ) is rewarded even for the footsteps of his horse, while it wanders about.
7. Jihad has been prescribed for Moslems, by Mohammad and Allah, and not by Allah alone.
From Day One of its existence, Islam has been a Military-Ideology, and Kafirs have been on its SH**-List. It still is " An Implacable Foe Of The Kafirs. " Spirituality is non-existent in Islam & Islam does not qualify as a religion. But its Jihad is " Top Of The Line Barbarism. "
Surinder Paul Attri
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)