Response to Shri Chaudhari's comment

Subj: Response to Shri Chaudhari's comment
1. ATTRIJI,
Namaskar! There is a Sanskrit verse: SARVA DHARMAH SAMBHWAY, it does not say that in it an ADHARMA can also be accommodated.
Hindus are often bullied and blackmailed that if our scriptures say all religions are same then why do they exclude Islam. This sort of blame also comes from ignorant Hindus too.
Some persons, who must be of the lowest intelligence cannot come to the terms that Religion is pious, religion is Maryada, religion is Civilised and civilising code and conduct. How can we include a school of thought in the definition of religion, which advocates perpetual conflict with those, who do not subscribe to such an ideologgy?
Therefore all religions are indeed same as envisaged in our holy scriptures, but irreligion has no place there or any where!
Regards
BK Chaudhari
2. My Take:
Namashkar to you as well, Chaudhari Sahib.
Quote:
Some persons, who must be of the lowest intelligence cannot come to the terms that Religion is pious, religion is Maryada, religion is Civilised and civilising code and conduct. How can we include a school of thought in the definition of religion, which advocates perpetual conflict with those, who do not subscribe to such an ideologgy?
COMMENT: Quite true !
Sullas are not particularly bright, they are not even smart enough to recognize that:
a. Islam has spread through the use of force ( sword ), and that Islam has let loose a tornado of Kafir ( Non-Moslem Infidels ) slaughter.
b. Civilization of Islamic societies is nearly zero.
c. Islam’s toleration of Kafir religions ( Non-Moslem religions ) is less than zero.
3. You are absolutely correct that religion is supposed to be pious, civilized, and for the uplift of the soul. But Islam is exact opposite of this definition. Islam is for the wreckage of soul, and for the destruction of Kafir religions ( Non-Moslem religions ).
To put it simply:
Islam is not a religion at all. Islam is an imperialist political ideology. To include Islam among the civilized religions or as a Dharma, is just about the most ill-advised notion.
4. To put it in historical sense of depth:
It was the Sullas of India who stated in 1946 that:
They did not want to live with Kafirs of India, and wanted to live in a land of their own, which they labeled as Pakistan. But after the creation of Pakistan ( in 1947 ), more than 90 % of these same Sullas stayed back in India…..why & with what face ?
Why don’t these Sullas get their A** up in Pakistan ?
The loyalty ( to India ) of these Sullas is Highly-Suspect.
If it were up to me, I would send these sneaky-crooks ( all of them ), cart-wheeling to Pakistan.
Surinder Paul Attri