Assessment of John Dayal's comments

Subj: Assessment of John Dayal's comments.
1. swamijyoti to me
show details Apr 22 (2 days ago) Reply
Please give your comments on John Dayal's posting given below. Thanks.
SJ
2. My Take:
When examining a report of the subject type, you have to question the source of the report, specifically who is the author of this report. The statements of a person say a lot about the person. The question then becomes:
Do John Dayal's comments have any credibility ?
From what he has written & is still touting, it becomes undeniably clear that he holds that, whatever the Hindu does is evil, immoral, & communal, but whatever the Christian ( or other minority such as the Moslem ) does, is virtuous & secular. John Dayal is giving Hell to the Hindu, while giving benefit of all doubt to his own creed of Christianity. His nasty Hindu-Confrotation sketches that:
Whatever is on the minority-side ( Moslems & Christians ) of the road, is automatically forgiven, but whatever is on the majority side ( the Hindu side ), must be punished to the limits of the law.
3 John Dayal talks about " the secular character of Indian Constitution ", but sides with the vested Christian interests in NE India, who openly talk about fully Christianizing all of NE India, and pulling out of India. Is this the kind of secularism that is on his mind ( Secularism under Christian control ) ? He also promotes alliances between Christians, Communists, and Moslems ( but totally excluding Hindus, the largest fraction of the population ). Does this kind of communal alliance fit John Dayal's description of secularism of Indian Constitution, for the simple reason that it is directed against the Hindu ?
4. John Dayal's hatred of the Hindu, is not anything new. Last year, he conducted a huge rally at the UN in New York, loudly dressing down the Hindus, as fascists & caste-supramacists, and responsible for violence against the Indian Christians, and for corrupting the Indian Democracy & Indian Constitution. Of course, John Dayal is conveniently forgetting the attacks on Non-Christian villages & communities in North-East India, by his co-religious Christians, in Christian-controlled states. There, the Non-Christians are told:
" This is a Christian state. Either convert to Christianity, or leave. Otherwise, you will be killed. "
It ia said that before the murder of Swami Laxmananda in the state of Orissa, John Dayal was in that area, and some suspect that he was in a meeting, where it was decided to do away with Swami Laxmananda.
5. John Dayal criticizes Advani for seeking support of Hindu Sadhus, in the oncoming elections, but makes no mention of the Phoney-Liberal politicians of India, who play the vote-bank politics, which is a communal act. He sees no evil in this kind of communalism, because it is directed against the Hindu.
He also accuses the BJP of castigating the expert opinion. There is no proof that BJP either has or is going to berate or disregard expert opinion, if voted to power. John Dayal engages in fear mongering & mis-directing the facts of the situation.
6. John Dayal constantly harps on the secularism of India. But what we have in India is Not secularism but pseudo-secularism ( Phoney-Liberalism ). Many examples can be cited to depict the hollowness of this claim :
a. The Prime Minister of the ruling UPA stated that:
" Moslems have the first claim to the resources of India."
This statement is menacingly-communal, it does not have the qualification of being even, remotely secular.
b. Hindu temples are controlled by the government, under " Hindu Religious Endowment Boards ". Hindu monies from these temples go to the government. But corresponding monies from churches & mosques are kept by the churches & mosques. If this is Not communal ( and disciminatory ), then what the hell is this ?
c. Many Hindu temples that need repair, are forced to close down for want of funds, but similar churches & mosques are allocated funds by the government, for their repair & renovation.
d. Moslems who want to travel to Mecca, are offered substantial Haj-Subsidy by the government. Similarly, Christians who want to travel to Jerusalem, receive subsidy in the same amount as the Moslems. But any Hindu who wants to travel to his sacred places of worship, does not get even a tinker's damn from the government.
e. Processions of minority communities are allowed free access, but similar Hindu processions are confronted with obstructions and labelled as communal.
f. And so on & on.
But these blatant acts of injustice meted out to the Hindu, do not distress or dismay John Dayal, because they are directed against the Hindu.
7. John Dayal does not miss his chance to talk about the demolition of Babri-Masjid, but makes no mention of Babar's aggression on the Hindu. John's total disregard of Hindu's feelings, exposes his lack of fair-mindedness.
Catholic Church of India which John heads, is notorious for the mis-treatment of nuns, several of whom have committed suicide, because the Catholic church did not do anythng about their complaints of sexual abuse by the priests. Why is John not jumping on the float of his Catholic church ?
8. To put it simply, John Dayal is flipping things upside down. He plays footsie with the enemies of Hinduism. He goes about knocking down the Hindu bridge. He is also an expert at fear-mongering.
Surinder Paul Attri