Sunday, October 2, 2011

The nature of Islam

Subj: The nature of Islam

1. Quote: you are 100 % right --------- not only ''the EXTINCTION of Hindus from Hindusthan.'' but ''the EXTINCTION of all non-muslims from the whole world.'' and FEEDING THE WOLF- ONE AT A TIME.

2. COMMENT: Is this assessment of Islam correct ?

Let us take a peek at Islam. Islamic clergy claims loftily & loudly that:
" Islam is a religion of peace, love, and brotherhood."

This is a serious misrepresentation of the fundamental doctrine of Islam. In fact, it is a mockery, it is designed to make people believe that, lamb is cruel but wolf is courteious. If Islam were really that peaceful, loving, and brotherly, then why would it engage in terrorism & Jihadic-Imperialism, then why would it seek conversion, through the most vitriolic means, then why does it regard Jihad as the most sacred-violence ?.

3. If you talk to a Moslem, he would deny all these allegations, claiming thunderingly that, Islam as a religion was Never involved in iconoclasm, that Jihad does not mean murder or mutilation of Kafirs, that Jihad only imples struggle against one's own lower instincts, to purify one's self, to qualify for entry into Janat ( Moslem's Paradise ).This is just a Big Fat Lie, designed to fool people.

Islam does have five basic cannons, that is, Kalma, Namaz,Roza, Zukat, and Hajj. Islam does not include Jihad in its Five Basic Cannons, The reason for this exclusion ( even though Jihad is a very important Cannon of Islam ) is to create ambiguity for believers, so that they can & should carry out acts of barbarity, without bothering to enquire into the nature of Islam. Further, even though the observing of the five basic cannons of Islam is good for a Moslem, they provide no guarantee of Janat for a Moslem. But the sixth cannon of Jihad, which invloves maiming & murdering of Kafirs ( Non-Moslem Infidels ), guarantees.a way, that leads straight into Janat.

4. Since Jihad is a serious issue for a Moslem, and it involves the fundamental doctrine of Islam, to lie about it ought to be sinful for a Moslem. But it is no more dishonest for a Moslem than, the big lie technique that Islamic Clergy regularly employs.

Then what exactly is the truth about Islam ?

Answer: To Islam, terror is synonymous with power. That explains the desire of some Moslems, to establish a Caliphate on earth, under Allah's vicegerent. The Caliph, ruling by Islamic law ( Sharia ), would impose rigid subservience & sacrilized discrimination, against Kafirs ( Non-Moslem Infidels ) and against Moslem women, without conscience.

5. That is why the assessment of the above quote, about the total eradication of all Kafirs ( Non-Moslem Infidels ), Hindus included, as the fundamental aim of Islam, is absolutely correct.

Surinder Paul Attri

Saturday, September 24, 2011

Castration of a Kafir

Subj: Castration of a Kafir

1. Bal Chaudhari to Rajinder, me, bal, balraj, D, David, Kailash, Ram, Shri, smdave1940, Sudhakarji, suruchiprakash.

A news item appears as below in the Tribune newspaper:



THE POLICE YESTERDAY ARRESTED KHALIQUDDIN(40)

FOR CONDUCTING A SURGERY TO REMOVE THE GENITALS OF A MAN, RAMESH

WITHOUT HIS CONSENT AFTER HE WAS GIVEN A SEDATIVE>



This is another method of serving Islam.



Breed yourself and yourself only!



BKC

2. COMMENT: Yes, it is definitely a technique of building-up Moslem numbers ( and abridging Kafir numbers ). Reciprocity of this technique is also a valid approach, that is, castrating ten Moslems for each castrated-Kafirs. This approach is a turn for the better for human species, it will augment ratio of desirable specimens ( Kafirs ), and diminish proportion of undesirable specimens ( Moslems ).

3. It will pass on a strong password/signal to Sullas that, their barbaric action, shall be paid back in full.

Surinder Paul Attri

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

France bans street prayers


Subj: France bans street prayers

1. PARIS (Reuters) - A French ban on praying in the street came into force on Friday, driving thousands of Muslim worshippers in northern Paris into a makeshift prayer site in a disused fire brigade barracks, angering a small but vocal minority.

The street-prayer ban has highlighted France's problems assimilating its 5-million-strong Muslim community, which lacks prayer space, and follows a long-running controversy, fanned by far-right leader Marine Le Pen, over Muslims forced to lay their prayer mats on the streets in big cities.

Interior Minister Claude Gueant directed Muslims in Paris to temporary spaces made available pending the building of a huge new prayer space and warned that force would be used if necessary as police end their tolerance of street prayers.

Seven months before a presidential election, the ban has struck some in France as an attempt to rally far-right sympathizers to President Nicolas Sarkozy's center-right camp.

At the barracks, Cheik Mohammed Salah Hamza oversaw prayers for Muslims who had migrated from around the city. Worshippers streamed in, spreading their woven prayer mats over the floor of the hangar-like building and out into the courtyard.

"It's the beginning of a solution," Hamza told Reuters before the start of the service. "The faithful are very pleased to be here. The space, which holds 2,000, is full."

Many worshippers were also upbeat. "This will be better than rue Mryha," said one man, referring to a Paris street renowned for hosting street prayers. "Apparently, it shocked people."

Le Pen has described the growing phenomenon of praying on the streets and sidewalks as an "invasion."

"It's Marine Le Pen who started all this," a woman who gave her name as Assya said on her way into the former barracks on the outskirts of Paris. "Now the government has banned street prayers and sent us here so they can gather votes from the (far-right) National Front (party) -- that's all."

"NO SYSTEM CAN CONTROL US"

In France, where a strict separation of church and state has been in force for a century, public displays of religious activity are frowned upon.

Yet efforts by Sarkozy's conservative government to restrict religious displays, such as a ban on full-face veils, have drawn criticism as empty measures that unfairly single out Muslims.

France counts the largest Muslim minority of any European country. But only a portion -- about 10 percent, or the same proportion as among Catholics -- are practicing, according to Muslim associations.

As a rule, radical Muslim voices in France are rare, but Friday's prayers in northern Paris drew a small but angry protest from a radical minority more often seen in online posts.

An hour before the first prayer young men with beards, green headbands and banners gathered on rue Myrha to discourage worshippers from moving to the new site.

"No system in the universe can control us aside from Allah," shouted one young man. "There is more dignity in praying in the grass than in their false mosque," said another.

As the prayers began, dozens of young men belonging to a group called Forsane Alizza disrupted the service with shouts of "Allahu akbar" -- "God is greatest" -- and jostled with security.

2. COMMENT:

This is the Right way to deal with the problem. Other European & Asian countries, India included, ought to follow the French example. It is crazy behavior, it blocks roads, and meddles with traffic. Moslems also use loudspeakers for their prayers. It creates noise & nuisance for every Non-Moslem Infidels around. Moslems must Not be allowed to stick their nose in street traffic.

Surinder Paul Attri

Friday, September 16, 2011

Comments on I have a question on use of temple money


1..Subj: Comments on I have a question on use of temple money

Poonam Abbi to me

Aadarneey Attri Ji,

You said, "It is not state property. If the money came from taxes, then it is state property, and belongs to the state. But temple offerings & contributions are not tax money. They do not belong in the state treasury. The temple money came from the devotees. " There is also the issue that much of the money that comes from the devotees is in form of the daily chadhawas etc. & that is the money the devotees have alerady paid the tax on. Does the state have the right to first collect the tax on the money, & then go & grab the money too?

2. COMMENT:

Quote: There is also the issue that much of the money that comes from the devotees is in form of the daily chadhawas etc. & that is the money the devotees have alerady paid the tax on.

COMMENT: Yes, it is Net Income of the devotees ( that is, income after payment of the taxes ).

3. Quote: Does the state have the right to first collect the tax on the money, & then go & grab the money too?

COMMENT: Poonam Jee: The government has no such right/rights.

It measures up to a massive piece of swindle job. That is how pickpickets operate.

4. To put it in plain-spoken language: Government has no business sticking its nose, in temple business or in temple's money. Any body who believes otherwise, is really gullible.

Surinder Paul Attri

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Comment on I have a question on the use of temple money


Subj: Comment on I have a question on the use of temple money

1. Poonam Abbi to me:

Use it to fud a very aggressive campaign against the Anti-Hindu propaganda machine at home & abroad...that machine is made up of muslims, christians & Hindus who are eager to pretend being "logical" One of the problems is that Hindus have moved away from the basic & fundamentals of the Sanatan Dharm. They have forgotten that they follow the Sanatan Dharm & try very hard to fit into the mold of Hondu as defined by criminals like muslims & christians. We need to get back to the basic foundations of our Dharm, which is not synonymous for religion.

2. COMMENT:

Quote: We need to get back to the basic foundations of our Dharm, which is not synonymous for religion.

COMMENT: Yes, we need to get back to the fundamental principles of Vedic Dharma...Dealing with Evil and Standing Up to it.

3. Quote: Use it to fud a very aggressive campaign against the Anti-Hindu propaganda machine at home & abroad...that machine is made up of muslims, christians & Hindus who are eager to pretend being "logical"

COMMENT: Yes, This is a very pragmatic & businesslike use of temple money.

It has been expressed that pen is mightier than sword, which it is. But there is one thing that, is mightier than either the pen or the sword, and that is Nakad-Narain ( that is, money, money, money ).

Yes, we could start a very aggressive crusade for the practice & propagation of Hinduism, with the use of temple money. In the world of today, money is the glue that binds societies & religions, more than anything else. The temple money could give a new lease on life, to our Hinduism. In short, there are a million things that can be done, with temple money.

Surinder Paul Attri

Comment of I have a question ....

Subj: Comment of I have a question ....
1. bk chaudhari to me

I wholr-heartedly agree with you, Attriji.



The treasure belongs to the Temple and furthermore, it is our inheritance.

The precious images with artistic engravings are meant for guiidance for

future generations. They are inspirations and piece of continued history.

People who ignore history, are doomed.



BKC

2 COMMENT:

Quote: The treasure belongs to the Temple and furthermore, it is our inheritance.

The precious images with artistic engravings are meant for guiidance for

future generations.

COMMENT: Yes indeed. Those are accepted & established signs & symbols of our religion, expressed by words & engravings. They are our legacy too,and are etched into the minds of us Hindus. .

The temple money must Not be allowed to fall, into the hands of, good-for-nothing phony-liberal bunch ( secularists & leftists ). Hinduism could go to Hell, for all they care.

3. Quote: People who ignore history, are doomed.

COMMENT: We must Not forget the Hindu-Killing power of Islam's mercants of Kafir-death. We have first hand knowledge of Islam's barbarism, in India on the Kafir-Hindu stretching over 1200 years. This could happen again, Don't believe it cannot happen again. JIhadis now have guns, in place of swords.

Surinder Paul Attri.

I have got a question about use of temple money?

Subj: I have got a question about use of temple money?

1. Quite a few people want to get hold of temple money, and use it for purposes that are disingenuous and dishonest. Every one of them seems to want to distribute money that, does not belong to them, especially the secular & the leftist bunches. They argue furiously that this money is state property. The implication of this argument is that, it can be expropriated. I would take issue with it, it is an act of commandeering some one else's property. This approach is Anti-Temple, Anti-Hindu, and is thoroughly immoral & un-ethical.

2. But it is not only a moral question, it is a sacred question, it is also a substantial issue. It is not state property. If the money came from taxes, then it is state property, and belongs to the state. But temple offerings & contributions are not tax money. They do not belong in the state treasury. The temple money came from the devotees. How can the state lay claim to this money ? The correct approach is to hand over this money to a temple-trust, and use it for the welfare of the devotees.

3. The argument of the secularists & leftists is wishy-washy at best. What would they say if the money had been found, not at a temple, but in a church or in a mosque ? Would we be debating & arguing that this money ought to be used by the state ? The why this argument against the Hindu money ( temple-money ).? Clearly, the leftist argument is two-faced & wily.

4. Secular ought not to over-whelm the sacred. Temple-Money belongs to the temple and to its devotees. Let us respect our temples first, then argue about the money in these. The money belongs to the temples, and ought to be preserved there.

5. For the Hell of it, keep the Leftist & and the Phoney-Liberals, out of the temple money.

Surinder Paul Attri